Engineer Adam Full Circumstance Disclosure Firm Sale Negotiation Engineer Mary Status
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/58#Engineer_Adam_Full_Circumstance_Disclosure_Firm_Sale_Negotiation_Engineer_Mary_Status
Properties
Instance of
FullCircumstanceDisclosureinProfessionalNegotiationsObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#FullCircumstanceDisclosureinProfessionalNegotiationsObligation
Case context
Engineer Adam referenced Engineer Mary's earlier interest in purchasing the subsidiary without disclosing that Engineer Mary had subsequently and definitively declined, thereby creating a misleading impression of current competitive interest to pressure Engineer Baker in negotiations.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer Adam
Obligation statement
Engineer Adam was obligated to disclose to Engineer Baker the full and accurate circumstances of Engineer Mary's interest in the subsidiary — specifically that Engineer Mary had definitively declined further interest — rather than referencing her earlier expression of interest in a manner that created a false impression of current competitive bidding pressure.
Temporal scope
At the time of making the statement to Engineer Baker about 'another company's' interest
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Honesty Invoked in Engineer Adam Artfully Misleading Negotiation
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer Mary had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but after further consideration, Engineer Mary decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary.
Text references
'This Board strongly believes that honesty and truthfulness are hallmark qualities of a practicing engineer.'
Engineer Mary had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but after further consideration, Engineer Mary decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary.
Had Engineer Adam disclosed the full circumstances relating to his conversation with Engineer Mary, the Board's conclusion for Engineer Adam would have been different.
TTL
@prefix case58: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/58#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case58:Engineer_Adam_Full_Circumstance_Disclosure_Firm_Sale_Negotiation_Engineer_Mary_Status a proeth:FullCircumstanceDisclosureinProfessionalNegotiationsObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer Adam Full Circumstance Disclosure Firm Sale Negotiation Engineer Mary Status" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case58:Engineer_Adam_Artfully_Misleading_Statement_Prohibition_Firm_Sale_Negotiation ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case58:Engineer_Adam_Artfully_Misleading_Statement_Prohibition_Firm_Sale_Negotiation ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer Adam referenced Engineer Mary's earlier interest in purchasing the subsidiary without disclosing that Engineer Mary had subsequently and definitively declined, thereby creating a misleading impression of current competitive interest to pressure Engineer Baker in negotiations." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case58:Honesty_Invoked_in_Engineer_Adam_Artfully_Misleading_Negotiation ;
proeth:discoveredincase "58" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T21:58:16.305408+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "58" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T21:58:16.305408+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer Adam" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Full Circumstance Disclosure in Professional Negotiations Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer Adam was obligated to disclose to Engineer Baker the full and accurate circumstances of Engineer Mary's interest in the subsidiary — specifically that Engineer Mary had definitively declined further interest — rather than referencing her earlier expression of interest in a manner that created a false impression of current competitive bidding pressure." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer Mary had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but after further consideration, Engineer Mary decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of making the statement to Engineer Baker about 'another company's' interest" ;
proeth:textreferences "'This Board strongly believes that honesty and truthfulness are hallmark qualities of a practicing engineer.'",
"Engineer Mary had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but after further consideration, Engineer Mary decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary.",
"Had Engineer Adam disclosed the full circumstances relating to his conversation with Engineer Mary, the Board's conclusion for Engineer Adam would have been different." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 58 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T22:07:12.213858"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 58 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
58
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T21:58:16.305408+00:00
First case
58
Generated
2026-02-25T21:58:16.305408+00:00
Attributed to
Case 58 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T22:07:12.213858
Generated by
ProEthica Case 58 Extraction