DP1

Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/58#DP1
Properties
Instance of
DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint
Decision Point Id
DP1
Decision question
Should Engineer Intern D revise the design to artificially impact the old water main in response to Engineer W's indirect directive, given that the revision would violate DOT cost-allocation policy and divert approximately $700,000 of public funds to Shadyvale?
Focus
Engineer Intern D's decision whether to revise the policy-compliant design to artificially incorporate the old Shadyvale water main in response to Engineer W's indirect directive
Option1
Decline to revise the design and explicitly name the DOT cost-allocation policy conflict to Engineer W, then escalate the directive to higher DOT authority if Engineer W persists
Option2
Revise the design as directed in reliance on Engineer W's sign-off promise, treating the supervisor's acceptance of formal responsibility as sufficient ethical cover for the intern's execution of the revision
Option3
Decline to revise the design without escalating, treating silent non-compliance as a sufficient discharge of ethical obligation while deferring to Engineer W to resolve the policy question through other means
Role
Engineer Intern D Policy Violating Design Revision Refusal Shadyvale
TTL
@prefix case58: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/58#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case58:DP1 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP1" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP1" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer Intern D revise the design to artificially impact the old water main in response to Engineer W's indirect directive, given that the revision would violate DOT cost-allocation policy and divert approximately $700,000 of public funds to Shadyvale?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer Intern D's decision whether to revise the policy-compliant design to artificially incorporate the old Shadyvale water main in response to Engineer W's indirect directive" ; proeth:option1 "Decline to revise the design and explicitly name the DOT cost-allocation policy conflict to Engineer W, then escalate the directive to higher DOT authority if Engineer W persists" ; proeth:option2 "Revise the design as directed in reliance on Engineer W's sign-off promise, treating the supervisor's acceptance of formal responsibility as sufficient ethical cover for the intern's execution of the revision" ; proeth:option3 "Decline to revise the design without escalating, treating silent non-compliance as a sufficient discharge of ethical obligation while deferring to Engineer W to resolve the policy question through other means" ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer Intern D Policy Violating Design Revision Refusal Shadyvale" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T22:22:51.681317"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 58 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 23:35
Generated
2026-02-25T22:22:51.681317
Generated by
ProEthica Case 58 Extraction