Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard - Bridge Defect Reporting
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/57#Engineer_Public_Safety_Escalation_Standard_-_Bridge_Defect_Reporting
Properties
Instance of
EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard
Confidence
0.87
Created by
NSPE Code of Ethics, state DOT professional conduct standards
Document title
Professional norms governing escalation of public safety concerns in infrastructure inspection contexts
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer Intern A in determining the scope of required disclosure to Engineer B
Used in context
Governs Engineer Intern A's obligation to ensure that the full scope of the safety concern — including the five-year history of unreported defects — is communicated to Engineer B and, if necessary, escalated further to protect public safety on a bridge used by the public
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer Intern A reported the defect to Engineer B but did not report the fact that the defect had been visibly obvious for at least five years
Text references
Engineer Intern A reported the defect to Engineer B but did not report the fact that the defect had been visibly obvious for at least five years
the same inspector had failed to report the same defect for at least five years
TTL
@prefix case57: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/57#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case57:Engineer_Public_Safety_Escalation_Standard_-_Bridge_Defect_Reporting a proeth:EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard - Bridge Defect Reporting" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Code of Ethics, state DOT professional conduct standards" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "57" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Professional norms governing escalation of public safety concerns in infrastructure inspection contexts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T21:17:24.322553+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "57" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T21:17:24.322553+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer Intern A reported the defect to Engineer B but did not report the fact that the defect had been visibly obvious for at least five years" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer Intern A reported the defect to Engineer B but did not report the fact that the defect had been visibly obvious for at least five years",
"the same inspector had failed to report the same defect for at least five years" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer Intern A in determining the scope of required disclosure to Engineer B" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs Engineer Intern A's obligation to ensure that the full scope of the safety concern — including the five-year history of unreported defects — is communicated to Engineer B and, if necessary, escalated further to protect public safety on a bridge used by the public" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 57 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T21:32:46.432274"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 57 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
57
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T21:17:24.322553+00:00
First case
57
Generated
2026-02-25T21:17:24.322553+00:00
Attributed to
Case 57 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T21:32:46.432274
Generated by
ProEthica Case 57 Extraction