Engineer Intern A Materiality Judgment Restraint Present Case Bridge Inspection

@prefix case57: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/57#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case57:Engineer_Intern_A_Materiality_Judgment_Restraint_Present_Case_Bridge_Inspection a proeth:InternMaterialityJudgmentRestraintObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer Intern A Materiality Judgment Restraint Present Case Bridge Inspection" ; proeth-core:competesWith case57:Complete_Unfiltered_Upward_Reporting_Violated_By_Engineer_Intern_A_Bridge_Inspection, case57:Safety_Obligation_Invoked_Engineer_Intern_A_Bridge_Defect_Five_Year_History ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case57:Engineer_Intern_A_Materiality_Judgment_Incompetence_State, case57:Engineer_Intern_A_Selective_Information_Omission_in_Report_to_Supervisor, case57:Engineer_Intern_A_Unverified_Scope_of_Structural_Risk ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer Intern A discovered a visibly obvious concrete bridge defect and reported it to Engineer B but omitted the material fact that the same defect had been missed in inspection for at least five years; Board found Engineer Intern A was not qualified to independently evaluate the materiality of that historical information." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.95" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case57:Intern_Epistemic_Humility_and_Materiality_Deference_Obligation_Invoked_Present_Case ; proeth:discoveredincase "57" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T21:25:49.111562+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "57" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T21:25:49.111562+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer Intern A (present case)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Intern Materiality Judgment Restraint Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer Intern A was obligated to report to Engineer B all material facts related to the visibly obvious bridge defect — including the fact that the same defect had been missed in inspection for at least five years — without independently filtering that information based on a personal assessment that it might reduce urgency, because Engineer Intern A was not yet qualified to make that materiality determination." ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer Intern A failed to report the material information that the visibly obvious defect had been missed in inspection for at least five years." ; proeth:temporalscope "At the time of reporting the discovered bridge defect to supervising Engineer B" ; proeth:textreferences "As a practical matter, revealing that the visibly obvious defect had been in existence and unchanged for at least five years might have actually reduced the urgency of any investigation, but Engineer Intern A was not yet qualified to either make that determination or evaluate the materiality of the information.", "Engineer Intern A failed to report the material information that the visibly obvious defect had been missed in inspection for at least five years.", "Engineer Intern A had a responsibility to report all material facts related to the visibly obvious defect." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 57 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T21:32:46.445364"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 57 Extraction" .