DP4
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/56#DP4
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision question
Upon discovering that Transportation Engineer B is neither licensed nor degreed, should Engineer A report the unlicensed practice to the appropriate licensing board and simultaneously refuse to submit further sealed design documents for Transportation Engineer B's review — even if doing so jeopardizes Engineer A's contract with the State Agency?
Focus
Engineer A's Obligation to Report and Refuse Compliance Upon Discovering Transportation Engineer B's Unlicensed Status
Option1
Immediately suspend submission of sealed documents to Transportation Engineer B, simultaneously notify the State Agency manager of the licensure concern, and file a formal report with the state licensing board within a brief, defined window if the agency does not designate a licensed reviewer
Option2
Continue submitting sealed documents to the State Agency under the existing contract workflow while raising the licensure concern informally with the State Agency manager, deferring formal reporting until internal resolution is confirmed or denied
Option3
Suspend sealed document submissions to Transportation Engineer B specifically while continuing other contract deliverables, request written confirmation from the State Agency of the reviewer's qualifications, and report to the licensing board only if the agency's written response confirms the unlicensed status
Role
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case56: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/56#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case56:DP4 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP4" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Upon discovering that Transportation Engineer B is neither licensed nor degreed, should Engineer A report the unlicensed practice to the appropriate licensing board and simultaneously refuse to submit further sealed design documents for Transportation Engineer B's review — even if doing so jeopardizes Engineer A's contract with the State Agency?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer A's Obligation to Report and Refuse Compliance Upon Discovering Transportation Engineer B's Unlicensed Status" ;
proeth:option1 "Immediately suspend submission of sealed documents to Transportation Engineer B, simultaneously notify the State Agency manager of the licensure concern, and file a formal report with the state licensing board within a brief, defined window if the agency does not designate a licensed reviewer" ;
proeth:option2 "Continue submitting sealed documents to the State Agency under the existing contract workflow while raising the licensure concern informally with the State Agency manager, deferring formal reporting until internal resolution is confirmed or denied" ;
proeth:option3 "Suspend sealed document submissions to Transportation Engineer B specifically while continuing other contract deliverables, request written confirmation from the State Agency of the reviewer's qualifications, and report to the licensing board only if the agency's written response confirms the unlicensed status" ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer A" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T21:16:09.393024"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 56 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-02-25T21:16:09.393024
Generated by
ProEthica Case 56 Extraction