DP3

DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint

DP3

Does the State Agency's deliberate and systemic assignment of the 'Transportation Engineer' title to non-licensed, non-degreed management personnel constitute an independent institutional violation of professional title integrity and qualification transparency that Engineer A is obligated to challenge through appropriate channels beyond reporting Transportation Engineer B's individual unlicensed practice, and does Engineer A's continued submission of sealed documents to the agency without challenging the title misrepresentation constitute implicit legitimization of that misrepresentation?

The State Agency's independent ethical and institutional culpability for systematically assigning engineering-implying titles to non-licensed, non-degreed management personnel, and Engineer A's obligation to challenge that systemic practice — not merely Transportation Engineer B's individual conduct — as a matter of professional title integrity, qualification transparency, and public welfare protection.

Formally challenge the State Agency's systemic 'Transportation Engineer' title assignment practice by raising the concern in writing with senior agency leadership, simultaneously escalating to the state engineering licensing board to report both Transportation Engineer B's individual unlicensed practice and the agency's broader institutional title misassignment pattern, and document Engineer A's objection to the practice in all subsequent professional correspondence with the agency

Report Transportation Engineer B's individual unlicensed practice to the state licensing board and raise the title concern informally with the State Agency manager, but limit the formal challenge to Transportation Engineer B's specific conduct rather than the agency's broader title classification system, on the grounds that challenging the agency's civil service personnel classification practice exceeds the scope of Engineer A's individual professional reporting obligation and risks overstepping into an administrative law dispute outside the NSPE Code's domain

Continue submitting sealed documents to the State Agency while documenting Engineer A's independent engineering judgment on each revision directed by Transportation Engineer B, and raise the systemic title concern through a professional association or NSPE chapter rather than through direct reporting to the state licensing board, treating the systemic issue as a policy advocacy matter rather than an individual ethics reporting obligation

Engineer A