DP5

@prefix case5: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/5#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case5:DP5 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP5" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP5" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "If the City declines to correct the fraudulent public engagement record after Engineer M's formal escalation, should Engineer M report Firm DBA's ethical violations to the state engineering licensure board to prevent similar situations from occurring in the future, even if such reporting risks disrupting the infrastructure project timeline?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer M's obligation to report Firm DBA's ethical violations to the state engineering licensure board after the City — itself implicated as a directing party — fails to take corrective action, and whether such reporting produces better long-term outcomes for public welfare and professional integrity than limiting escalation to the City alone." ; proeth:option1 "Report Firm DBA's ethical violations to the state engineering licensure board after the City declines to take corrective action, documenting the full escalation sequence and the specific deficiencies in the public engagement report" ; proeth:option2 "Limit escalation to the City and refrain from reporting to the licensure board, on the grounds that external reporting would disrupt the project timeline and harm Community P by delaying infrastructure improvements" ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer M" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T16:36:51.374257"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 5 Extraction" .