BER Case 60-3
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/5#BER_Case_60-3
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.99
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 60-3
Importance
high
Used by
BER in analyzing whether the NSPE Code applies to Firm DBA's public relations services
Used in context
Cited as prior precedent holding that an engineering firm providing sub-professional services was not required to abide by the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct; distinguished in the current case because the Code has since been revised and Firm DBA has licensed PEs in supervisory and ownership roles
Source Evidence
Source text
In BER Case 60-3, the facts indicated that an engineering firm was providing sub-professional services and, because of that, the firm was not required to abide by the provisions of the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct.
Text references
In BER Case 60-3, the facts indicated that an engineering firm was providing sub-professional services and, because of that, the firm was not required to abide by the provisions of the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct.
The conclusion by the BER in BER Case 60-3 was that the Canons and Rules did not apply. However, the Code has been revised since that time.
TTL
@prefix case5: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/5#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case5:BER_Case_60-3 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER Case 60-3" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.99" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "5" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 60-3" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T13:47:48.308135+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "5" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T13:47:48.308135+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "In BER Case 60-3, the facts indicated that an engineering firm was providing sub-professional services and, because of that, the firm was not required to abide by the provisions of the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct." ;
proeth:textreferences "In BER Case 60-3, the facts indicated that an engineering firm was providing sub-professional services and, because of that, the firm was not required to abide by the provisions of the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct.",
"The conclusion by the BER in BER Case 60-3 was that the Canons and Rules did not apply. However, the Code has been revised since that time." ;
proeth:usedby "BER in analyzing whether the NSPE Code applies to Firm DBA's public relations services" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Cited as prior precedent holding that an engineering firm providing sub-professional services was not required to abide by the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct; distinguished in the current case because the Code has since been revised and Firm DBA has licensed PEs in supervisory and ownership roles" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 5 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T14:07:05.442341"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 5 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
5
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-24T13:47:48.308135+00:00
First case
5
Generated
2026-02-24T13:47:48.308135+00:00
Attributed to
Case 5 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T14:07:05.442341
Generated by
ProEthica Case 5 Extraction