BER Case 09-10
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/5#BER_Case_09-10
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.99
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 09-10
Importance
high
Used by
BER in establishing Engineer M's procedural obligations when confronting Firm DBA's potential violations
Used in context
Cited as precedent establishing that when an engineer discovers potential ethical or licensure violations by another firm, the engineer has an obligation to first communicate with the other party for clarification and, if not satisfied, may be required to report the matter to the state engineering licensure board; applied to Engineer M's obligations regarding Firm DBA's conduct
Source Evidence
Source text
In BER Case 09-10, Engineer A owned ABC Engineering in State P. Engineer X owned XYZ Engineering in State Q.
Text references
In BER Case 09-10, Engineer A owned ABC Engineering in State P. Engineer X owned XYZ Engineering in State Q.
The BER found that Engineer A should communicate with Engineer X to obtain clarification regarding the matter in question.
The BER further found that if Engineer A was not sufficiently satisfied with Engineer X's explanation, Engineer A may be required to report this matter to the state engineering licensure board.
TTL
@prefix case5: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/5#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case5:BER_Case_09-10 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER Case 09-10" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.99" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "5" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 09-10" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T13:47:48.308135+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "5" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T13:47:48.308135+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "In BER Case 09-10, Engineer A owned ABC Engineering in State P. Engineer X owned XYZ Engineering in State Q." ;
proeth:textreferences "In BER Case 09-10, Engineer A owned ABC Engineering in State P. Engineer X owned XYZ Engineering in State Q.",
"The BER found that Engineer A should communicate with Engineer X to obtain clarification regarding the matter in question.",
"The BER further found that if Engineer A was not sufficiently satisfied with Engineer X's explanation, Engineer A may be required to report this matter to the state engineering licensure board." ;
proeth:usedby "BER in establishing Engineer M's procedural obligations when confronting Firm DBA's potential violations" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Cited as precedent establishing that when an engineer discovers potential ethical or licensure violations by another firm, the engineer has an obligation to first communicate with the other party for clarification and, if not satisfied, may be required to report the matter to the state engineering licensure board; applied to Engineer M's obligations regarding Firm DBA's conduct" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 5 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T14:07:05.442791"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 5 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
5
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-24T13:47:48.308135+00:00
First case
5
Generated
2026-02-24T13:47:48.308135+00:00
Attributed to
Case 5 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T14:07:05.442791
Generated by
ProEthica Case 5 Extraction