DP4
Individual
d8b0272a
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/4#DP4
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision Question
Before accepting the City's binary choice between the Traditional and Sustainable Approaches, was Engineer K obligated to formally explore and propose a hybrid design solution that would mitigate the disproportionate flood diversion risk to the underserved community, and to ensure that community had meaningful representation in the stakeholder process?
Focus
Engineer K Non-Discrimination and Hybrid Solution Obligation: Pre-Approval Duty to Explore Third-Path Design and Ensure Equitable Stakeholder Representation
Option1
Formally develop and present a hybrid design alternative targeting mitigation of the disproportionate flood diversion risk to the underserved community, and affirmatively design the stakeholder process to ensure that community has meaningful notice and participation before the City Council vote
Option2
Present only the two client-scoped design alternatives to the City Council and conduct the stakeholder process as directed by the City without independently seeking to expand representation of the underserved community
Role Label
Engineer K Flood Control Design Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_4: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/4> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/4#DP4> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
d8b0272a1d559520...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T15:01:42.046688
Generated By
ProEthica Case 4 Extraction