DP2
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/4#DP2
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP2
Decision question
Was Engineer K obligated to explore and formally propose a hybrid design solution combining targeted elements of the Sustainable Approach specifically to mitigate the disproportionate flood risk to the underserved community, rather than limiting the City's choice to a binary selection between the Traditional and Sustainable Approaches?
Focus
Engineer K's obligation to explore and formally propose a hybrid design solution that could mitigate the disproportionate flood diversion risk to the underserved community before accepting the City's binary framing of the design choice
Option1
Develop and formally present a hybrid design solution incorporating targeted sustainable elements specifically to mitigate the disproportionate flood diversion risk to the underserved community, with full cost, risk, and benefit analysis, before the City Council vote — expanding the option set beyond the binary Traditional vs. Sustainable framing
Option2
Present only the two client-defined design alternatives — Traditional and Sustainable — completely and objectively to the City Council without independently developing or proposing a hybrid solution, treating the binary framing as the authorized scope of the professional engagement
Role
Engineer K Flood Control Design Engineer
TTL
@prefix case4: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/4#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case4:DP2 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP2" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP2" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Was Engineer K obligated to explore and formally propose a hybrid design solution combining targeted elements of the Sustainable Approach specifically to mitigate the disproportionate flood risk to the underserved community, rather than limiting the City's choice to a binary selection between the Traditional and Sustainable Approaches?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer K's obligation to explore and formally propose a hybrid design solution that could mitigate the disproportionate flood diversion risk to the underserved community before accepting the City's binary framing of the design choice" ;
proeth:option1 "Develop and formally present a hybrid design solution incorporating targeted sustainable elements specifically to mitigate the disproportionate flood diversion risk to the underserved community, with full cost, risk, and benefit analysis, before the City Council vote — expanding the option set beyond the binary Traditional vs. Sustainable framing" ;
proeth:option2 "Present only the two client-defined design alternatives — Traditional and Sustainable — completely and objectively to the City Council without independently developing or proposing a hybrid solution, treating the binary framing as the authorized scope of the professional engagement" ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer K Flood Control Design Engineer" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T15:01:42.046552"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 4 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-02-24T15:01:42.046552
Generated by
ProEthica Case 4 Extraction