City Selection Inconsistent with Climate Resilience Policy
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/4#City_Selection_Inconsistent_with_Climate_Resilience_Policy
Properties
Instance of
Policy-MisalignedClientDecisionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Policy-MisalignedClientDecisionState
Active period
From City Council approval of Traditional Approach through project implementation
Affected parties
City
Engineer K
Urban community
Confidence
0.88
Importance
medium
Subject
Engineer K's professional position following City's selection of Traditional Approach despite climate resilience policy
Terminated by
Not terminated within the case facts
Triggering event
City approves Traditional Approach despite Engineer K's presentation of its limitations relative to City's own climate resilience policies
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
The City has policies in place to develop new infrastructure projects with resiliency due to climate change in mind
Text references
Engineer K personally believes the Sustainable Approach aligns better with both City policies
The City approves the Traditional Approach and Engineer K proceeds to work on its implementation
The City has policies in place to develop new infrastructure projects with resiliency due to climate change in mind
TTL
@prefix case4: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/4#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case4:City_Selection_Inconsistent_with_Climate_Resilience_Policy a proeth:Policy-MisalignedClientDecisionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "City Selection Inconsistent with Climate Resilience Policy" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From City Council approval of Traditional Approach through project implementation" ;
proeth:affectedparties "City",
"Engineer K",
"Urban community" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "4" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T14:27:27.111965+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "4" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T14:27:27.111965+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:sourcetext "The City has policies in place to develop new infrastructure projects with resiliency due to climate change in mind" ;
proeth:stateclass "Policy-Misaligned Client Decision State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer K's professional position following City's selection of Traditional Approach despite climate resilience policy" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not terminated within the case facts" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer K personally believes the Sustainable Approach aligns better with both City policies",
"The City approves the Traditional Approach and Engineer K proceeds to work on its implementation",
"The City has policies in place to develop new infrastructure projects with resiliency due to climate change in mind" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "City approves Traditional Approach despite Engineer K's presentation of its limitations relative to City's own climate resilience policies" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 4 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T14:47:31.239553"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 4 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
4
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-24T14:27:27.111965+00:00
First case
4
Generated
2026-02-24T14:27:27.111965+00:00
Attributed to
Case 4 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T14:47:31.239553
Generated by
ProEthica Case 4 Extraction