DP5

DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint

DP5

When formal agency processes have not yet been established to authorize as-built sharing, and withholding fire protection as-built drawings could create safety risks, how should Engineer D balance the public welfare paramount principle against the faithful agent and formal channel obligations?

Engineer D faces a structural tension between two legitimate obligations: the safety-critical nature of fire protection systems creates a heightened duty to ensure contractors have accurate as-built information before commencing work, while the formal channel requirement prohibits sharing employer-owned documents without institutional authorization. Engineer D must decide how to resolve this apparent conflict when formal processes are slow or absent.

Unilaterally share fire protection as-built drawings with contractors outside formal channels, invoking the public welfare paramount principle to override faithful agent and employer consent obligations

Withhold fire protection as-built drawings entirely until formal authorization is obtained, accepting the safety risk as a consequence of procedural compliance

Urgently escalate the safety risk to agency management with a formal written request for immediate authorization to share fire protection as-built drawings, document the safety rationale, and simultaneously propose permanent inclusion of as-built references in all future fire protection renovation bid packages

Engineer D Fire Protection System As-Built Safety Disclosure Renovation Projects