DP4
Individual
1783170e
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/22#DP4
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision Question
Once Engineer D recognizes that informal as-built sharing has become a recurring pattern across multiple projects, should Engineer D continue addressing requests informally or initiate a formal institutional process to systematically include as-built drawings in future bid packages?
Focus
Engineer D has recognized a recurring pattern: contractors repeatedly request as-built drawings informally, both post-award and pre-bid, across multiple renovation projects. Engineer D has been responding on a case-by-case informal basis. At this point, Engineer D must decide whether to continue the informal ad hoc approach or take proactive steps to institutionalize a formal process.
Option1
Continue responding to contractor requests informally on a case-by-case basis, reasoning that the current approach is working and formal process change is outside Engineer D's authority
Option2
Cease all informal sharing immediately without initiating any formal remedy, leaving contractors without access to safety-critical as-built information
Option3
Formally document the recurring information gap, advocate to agency management and procurement officials for revising standard bid document procedures to include as-built drawing references, and obtain employer authorization to implement systematic equal-access disclosure for all future renovation projects
Role Label
Proactive Formal Process Initiation Engineer D Recurring Pre-Bid Requests
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_22: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/22> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/22#DP4> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
1783170eee58dcc6...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-25T20:18:49.331427
Generated By
ProEthica Case 22 Extraction