Truthfulness Insufficiency Recognition Engineer C Critique of Engineer B
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#Truthfulness_Insufficiency_Recognition_Engineer_C_Critique_of_Engineer_B
Properties
Instance of
TruthfulnessInsufficiencyRecognitioninCompetitorCritiqueObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#TruthfulnessInsufficiencyRecognitioninCompetitorCritiqueObligation
Case context
Engineer C provided critical assessments of Engineer B's professional decisions to the City Administrator, knowing that critical answers would advantage Engineer C in the upcoming contract competition, without having full knowledge of the circumstances under which Engineer B made those decisions.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer C
Obligation statement
Engineer C was obligated to recognize that any subjective belief in the truthfulness of critical opinions about Engineer B's decisions did not render those opinions ethically permissible, given Engineer C's lack of full situational knowledge and direct competitive interest in the outcome, and to refrain from providing specific critical opinions on that basis alone.
Temporal scope
At the time of formulating and delivering responses to the City Administrator's questions
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer C Incomplete Circumstantial Knowledge Criticism
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract.
Text references
Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.
Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract.
TTL
@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case20:Truthfulness_Insufficiency_Recognition_Engineer_C_Critique_of_Engineer_B a proeth:TruthfulnessInsufficiencyRecognitioninCompetitorCritiqueObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Truthfulness Insufficiency Recognition Engineer C Critique of Engineer B" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case20:Engineer_C_Incomplete_Circumstantial_Knowledge_Criticism ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer C provided critical assessments of Engineer B's professional decisions to the City Administrator, knowing that critical answers would advantage Engineer C in the upcoming contract competition, without having full knowledge of the circumstances under which Engineer B made those decisions." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case20:Honesty_Principle_Insufficient_Alone_to_Justify_Engineer_C_Critique,
case20:Honesty_Principle_Tension_with_Accuracy_in_Engineer_C_Critique ;
proeth:discoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T18:14:35.306994+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T18:14:35.306994+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer C" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Truthfulness Insufficiency Recognition in Competitor Critique Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer C was obligated to recognize that any subjective belief in the truthfulness of critical opinions about Engineer B's decisions did not render those opinions ethically permissible, given Engineer C's lack of full situational knowledge and direct competitive interest in the outcome, and to refrain from providing specific critical opinions on that basis alone." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of formulating and delivering responses to the City Administrator's questions" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.",
"Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T18:27:44.475398"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
20
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T18:14:35.306994+00:00
First case
20
Generated
2026-02-25T18:14:35.306994+00:00
Attributed to
Case 20 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T18:27:44.475398
Generated by
ProEthica Case 20 Extraction