Engineer C Prohibition on Reputation Injury Obligation Instance
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#Engineer_C_Prohibition_on_Reputation_Injury_Obligation_Instance
Properties
Instance of
Case context
Engineer C's critique of Engineer B's work was rendered in a context where Engineer C stood to gain competitive advantage by diminishing Engineer B's professional standing with Client A, and where Engineer C lacked full knowledge of Engineer B's decision-making circumstances.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer C
Obligation statement
Engineer C was obligated to refrain from attempting to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of Engineer B through competitive critique rendered without full knowledge of Engineer B's circumstances.
Temporal scope
During and after the conversation with the City Administrator about Engineer B's work
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer C Self-Interested Delivery Method Recommendation Analog
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineers shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of other engineers.
Text references
Engineer C's statements may not be accurate since C might not know all the circumstances.
Engineers shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of other engineers.
using the situation to Engineer C's advantage could be perceived the same way.
TTL
@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case20:Engineer_C_Prohibition_on_Reputation_Injury_Obligation_Instance a proeth:CollegialObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer C Prohibition on Reputation Injury Obligation Instance" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case20:Engineer_C_Solicited_Competitor_Critique_Objectivity_Obligation_Instance ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case20:Engineer_C_Self-Interested_Delivery_Method_Recommendation_Analog ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case20:Engineer_C_Solicited_Competitor_Critique_Objectivity_Obligation_Instance ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer C's critique of Engineer B's work was rendered in a context where Engineer C stood to gain competitive advantage by diminishing Engineer B's professional standing with Client A, and where Engineer C lacked full knowledge of Engineer B's decision-making circumstances." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case20:Prohibition_on_Reputation_Injury_Through_Competitive_Critique_Invoked_Against_Engineer_C,
case20:Prohibition_on_Reputation_Injury_Through_Competitive_Critique_Invoked_By_Engineer_C ;
proeth:discoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer C" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Collegial Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer C was obligated to refrain from attempting to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of Engineer B through competitive critique rendered without full knowledge of Engineer B's circumstances." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineers shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of other engineers." ;
proeth:temporalscope "During and after the conversation with the City Administrator about Engineer B's work" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer C's statements may not be accurate since C might not know all the circumstances.",
"Engineers shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of other engineers.",
"using the situation to Engineer C's advantage could be perceived the same way." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T16:36:27.864074"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
20
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00
First case
20
Generated
2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00
Attributed to
Case 20 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T16:36:27.864074
Generated by
ProEthica Case 20 Extraction