Engineer C Incomplete Knowledge Restraint Obligation Instance
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#Engineer_C_Incomplete_Knowledge_Restraint_Obligation_Instance
Properties
Instance of
IncompleteKnowledgeRestraintinCompetitorCritiqueObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#IncompleteKnowledgeRestraintinCompetitorCritiqueObligation
Case context
Engineer C was solicited by the City Administrator to evaluate Engineer B's work while Engineer B remained under an active contract with Client A and while Engineer C was competing for future work with Client A.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer C
Obligation statement
Engineer C was obligated to refrain from rendering specific critical opinions about Engineer B's work because Engineer C was not involved in Engineer B's decision-making process and lacked full knowledge of the circumstances under which Engineer B performed his work, making Engineer C's opinions potentially inaccurate even if subjectively believed to be truthful.
Temporal scope
At the time of the City Administrator's solicitation and throughout any subsequent conversation about Engineer B's work
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Incomplete Situational Knowledge Restraint Violated by Engineer C
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer C may not have known all the circumstances under which Engineer B performed his work as Engineer C was not involved in Engineer B's decision-making process.
Text references
Engineer C may not have known all the circumstances under which Engineer B performed his work as Engineer C was not involved in Engineer B's decision-making process.
Engineer C should have refrained from any criticism.
Not being fully aware of the circumstances of Engineer B's decisions could result in Engineer C giving an opinion that is not accurate, even though C feels that the opinion is truthful.
TTL
@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case20:Engineer_C_Incomplete_Knowledge_Restraint_Obligation_Instance a proeth:IncompleteKnowledgeRestraintinCompetitorCritiqueObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer C Incomplete Knowledge Restraint Obligation Instance" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case20:Engineer_C_Solicited_Critique_Objectivity_Obligation_Instance ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case20:Engineer_C_Solicited_Critique_Objectivity_Obligation_Instance ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer C was solicited by the City Administrator to evaluate Engineer B's work while Engineer B remained under an active contract with Client A and while Engineer C was competing for future work with Client A." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case20:Incomplete_Situational_Knowledge_Restraint_Violated_by_Engineer_C ;
proeth:discoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer C" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Incomplete Knowledge Restraint in Competitor Critique Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer C was obligated to refrain from rendering specific critical opinions about Engineer B's work because Engineer C was not involved in Engineer B's decision-making process and lacked full knowledge of the circumstances under which Engineer B performed his work, making Engineer C's opinions potentially inaccurate even if subjectively believed to be truthful." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer C may not have known all the circumstances under which Engineer B performed his work as Engineer C was not involved in Engineer B's decision-making process." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of the City Administrator's solicitation and throughout any subsequent conversation about Engineer B's work" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer C may not have known all the circumstances under which Engineer B performed his work as Engineer C was not involved in Engineer B's decision-making process.",
"Engineer C should have refrained from any criticism.",
"Not being fully aware of the circumstances of Engineer B's decisions could result in Engineer C giving an opinion that is not accurate, even though C feels that the opinion is truthful." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T16:36:27.862759"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
20
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00
First case
20
Generated
2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00
Attributed to
Case 20 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T16:36:27.862759
Generated by
ProEthica Case 20 Extraction