Engineer C Competitor Informal Consultation with City Administrator
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#Engineer_C_Competitor_Informal_Consultation_with_City_Administrator
Properties
Instance of
CompetitorInformalConsultationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetitorInformalConsultationState
Active period
During and following the City Administrator's informal conversation with Engineer C about Engineer B's work
Affected parties
Client A (City Administrator)
Engineer B
Engineer C
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer C's position as a competing firm being informally consulted by Client A about incumbent Engineer B's work
Terminated by
Not formally resolved within the case
Triggering event
City Administrator (Client A) contacted Engineer C to solicit opinions on Engineer B's engineering decisions
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer C has criticized the work of another engineer, Engineer B
Text references
Engineer C has been asked to evaluate another engineer's work, which in turn could give Engineer C a significant advantage in securing future work
Engineer C has criticized the work of another engineer, Engineer B
Engineer C voiced this criticism while Engineer B was still under contract with Client A
TTL
@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case20:Engineer_C_Competitor_Informal_Consultation_with_City_Administrator a proeth:CompetitorInformalConsultationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer C Competitor Informal Consultation with City Administrator" ;
proeth:activeperiod "During and following the City Administrator's informal conversation with Engineer C about Engineer B's work" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client A (City Administrator)",
"Engineer B",
"Engineer C" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T16:21:41.520751+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T16:21:41.520751+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer C has criticized the work of another engineer, Engineer B" ;
proeth:stateclass "Competitor Informal Consultation State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer C's position as a competing firm being informally consulted by Client A about incumbent Engineer B's work" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not formally resolved within the case" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer C has been asked to evaluate another engineer's work, which in turn could give Engineer C a significant advantage in securing future work",
"Engineer C has criticized the work of another engineer, Engineer B",
"Engineer C voiced this criticism while Engineer B was still under contract with Client A" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "City Administrator (Client A) contacted Engineer C to solicit opinions on Engineer B's engineering decisions" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T16:36:27.856954"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
20
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T16:21:41.520751+00:00
First case
20
Generated
2026-02-25T16:21:41.520751+00:00
Attributed to
Case 20 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T16:36:27.856954
Generated by
ProEthica Case 20 Extraction