Engineer C Competitor Informal Consultation

S · State Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#Engineer_C_Competitor_Informal_Consultation
Properties
Instance of
CompetitorInformalConsultationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetitorInformalConsultationState
Active period
From the moment City Administrator contacts Engineer C through Engineer C's provision of critical responses about Engineer B's decisions
Affected parties
City (Client A)
City Administrator
Engineer B
Engineer C
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer C's receipt of informal technical questions from City Administrator about Engineer B's work during active procurement competition
Terminated by
Not yet terminated — Engineer C has responded critically without disclosed recusal or conflict acknowledgment
Triggering event
City Administrator contacts Engineer C to question him on specific issues Engineer B has worked on for the City
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract.

Text references
Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.
Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract.
TTL
@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case20:Engineer_C_Competitor_Informal_Consultation a proeth:CompetitorInformalConsultationState, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer C Competitor Informal Consultation" ; proeth:activeperiod "From the moment City Administrator contacts Engineer C through Engineer C's provision of critical responses about Engineer B's decisions" ; proeth:affectedparties "City (Client A)", "City Administrator", "Engineer B", "Engineer C" ; proeth:conceptCategory "State" ; proeth:confidence "0.91" ; proeth:discoveredincase "20" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T16:20:36.580700+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T16:20:36.580700+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract." ; proeth:stateclass "Competitor Informal Consultation State" ; proeth:subject "Engineer C's receipt of informal technical questions from City Administrator about Engineer B's work during active procurement competition" ; proeth:terminatedby "Not yet terminated — Engineer C has responded critically without disclosed recusal or conflict acknowledgment" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.", "Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract." ; proeth:triggeringevent "City Administrator contacts Engineer C to question him on specific issues Engineer B has worked on for the City" ; proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T16:36:27.853880"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
20
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T16:20:36.580700+00:00
First case
20
Generated
2026-02-25T16:20:36.580700+00:00
Attributed to
Case 20 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T16:36:27.853880
Generated by
ProEthica Case 20 Extraction