Engineer C Competitive Conflict of Interest Disclosure Obligation Instance
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#Engineer_C_Competitive_Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Obligation_Instance
Properties
Instance of
CompetitiveConflictofInterestDisclosureBeforeAdvisoryCritiqueObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetitiveConflictofInterestDisclosureBeforeAdvisoryCritiqueObligation
Case context
Engineer C had a direct competitive financial interest in the Client A contract renewal and was simultaneously being asked to evaluate the incumbent engineer's work by the same client's administrator.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer C
Obligation statement
Engineer C was obligated to affirmatively disclose to the City Administrator his direct competitive financial interest in the outcome of the Client A contract renewal before or contemporaneously with providing any opinion about Engineer B's work, so that the City Administrator could appropriately weigh Engineer C's opinions in light of Engineer C's self-interest.
Temporal scope
Before or contemporaneously with providing any opinion about Engineer B's work to the City Administrator
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer C Conflict of Interest in Procurement Competition
derivedFromPrinciple
Conflict of Interest Disclosure in Advisory Engagements Applied to Engineer C
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer C has been asked to evaluate another engineer's work, which in turn could give Engineer C a significant advantage in securing future work.
Text references
Engineer C has been asked to evaluate another engineer's work, which in turn could give Engineer C a significant advantage in securing future work.
using the situation to Engineer C's advantage could be perceived the same way.
TTL
@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case20:Engineer_C_Competitive_Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Obligation_Instance a proeth:CompetitiveConflictofInterestDisclosureBeforeAdvisoryCritiqueObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer C Competitive Conflict of Interest Disclosure Obligation Instance" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case20:Engineer_C_Conflict_of_Interest_in_Procurement_Competition ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer C had a direct competitive financial interest in the Client A contract renewal and was simultaneously being asked to evaluate the incumbent engineer's work by the same client's administrator." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case20:Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_in_Advisory_Engagements_Applied_to_Engineer_C ;
proeth:discoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer C" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Competitive Conflict of Interest Disclosure Before Advisory Critique Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer C was obligated to affirmatively disclose to the City Administrator his direct competitive financial interest in the outcome of the Client A contract renewal before or contemporaneously with providing any opinion about Engineer B's work, so that the City Administrator could appropriately weigh Engineer C's opinions in light of Engineer C's self-interest." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer C has been asked to evaluate another engineer's work, which in turn could give Engineer C a significant advantage in securing future work." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Before or contemporaneously with providing any opinion about Engineer B's work to the City Administrator" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer C has been asked to evaluate another engineer's work, which in turn could give Engineer C a significant advantage in securing future work.",
"using the situation to Engineer C's advantage could be perceived the same way." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T16:36:27.863505"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
20
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00
First case
20
Generated
2026-02-25T16:28:47.673280+00:00
Attributed to
Case 20 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T16:36:27.863505
Generated by
ProEthica Case 20 Extraction