Engineer-Solicitation-Competition-Ethics-Standard-Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#Engineer-Solicitation-Competition-Ethics-Standard-Instance
Properties
Instance of
EngineerSolicitationandCompetitionEthicsStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerSolicitationandCompetitionEthicsStandard
Confidence
0.92
Created by
NSPE and state licensing boards through codified professional conduct rules
Document title
Professional Standards Governing Engineer Solicitation and Competitive Conduct
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer C and the City Administrator in the context of the contract renewal procurement process
Used in context
Establishes the prohibition on injuring the professional reputation of Engineer B through critical commentary made in the context of competing for the successor contract, grounding the ethical analysis of Engineer C's conduct
Version
Current professional consensus
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.
Text references
Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.
Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract.
TTL
@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case20:Engineer-Solicitation-Competition-Ethics-Standard-Instance a proeth:EngineerSolicitationandCompetitionEthicsStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Solicitation-Competition-Ethics-Standard-Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE and state licensing boards through codified professional conduct rules" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Professional Standards Governing Engineer Solicitation and Competitive Conduct" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T18:10:06.072641+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T18:10:06.072641+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Solicitation and Competition Ethics Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions." ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.",
"Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract." ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer C and the City Administrator in the context of the contract renewal procurement process" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Establishes the prohibition on injuring the professional reputation of Engineer B through critical commentary made in the context of competing for the successor contract, grounding the ethical analysis of Engineer C's conduct" ;
proeth:version "Current professional consensus" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T18:27:44.470797"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
20
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T18:10:06.072641+00:00
First case
20
Generated
2026-02-25T18:10:06.072641+00:00
Attributed to
Case 20 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T18:27:44.470797
Generated by
ProEthica Case 20 Extraction