Conflict of Interest Disclosure Obligation Invoked By Engineer C
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_By_Engineer_C
Properties
Instance of
ConflictofInterestDisclosureinAdvisoryEngagements
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictofInterestDisclosureinAdvisoryEngagements
Applied to
Engineer C's advisory critique of Engineer B's decisions provided to City Administrator
Balancing with
Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits
Honesty
Concrete expression
Engineer C provided critical evaluations of Engineer B's professional decisions to the City Administrator without disclosing that Engineer C was a direct competitor for the contract that Engineer B currently held and was seeking to renew, depriving the City Administrator of information necessary to assess the objectivity and reliability of Engineer C's critique
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Interpretation
In this context, Engineer C's competitive interest in the outcome of his critique of Engineer B constituted a material conflict of interest that required affirmative disclosure to the City Administrator before any evaluation was provided, so that the City Administrator could assess whether to seek independent, unconflicted evaluation of Engineer B's performance
Invoked by
Engineer C
Tension resolution
The conflict of interest disclosure obligation required Engineer C to either decline to provide the critique or affirmatively disclose his competitive interest before doing so; providing the critique without disclosure compounded the ethical violation by depriving the client of information necessary to evaluate the objectivity of the advice
Source Evidence
Source text
The City Administrator also has previous experiences with a competing firm, Engineer C. Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract.
Text references
Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.
Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract.
The City Administrator also has previous experiences with a competing firm, Engineer C.
TTL
@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case20:Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_By_Engineer_C a proeth:ConflictofInterestDisclosureinAdvisoryEngagements,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Conflict of Interest Disclosure Obligation Invoked By Engineer C" ;
proeth:appliedto "Engineer C's advisory critique of Engineer B's decisions provided to City Administrator" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits",
"Honesty" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer C provided critical evaluations of Engineer B's professional decisions to the City Administrator without disclosing that Engineer C was a direct competitor for the contract that Engineer B currently held and was seeking to renew, depriving the City Administrator of information necessary to assess the objectivity and reliability of Engineer C's critique" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T18:12:49.348529+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T18:12:49.348529+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "In this context, Engineer C's competitive interest in the outcome of his critique of Engineer B constituted a material conflict of interest that required affirmative disclosure to the City Administrator before any evaluation was provided, so that the City Administrator could assess whether to seek independent, unconflicted evaluation of Engineer B's performance" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer C" ;
proeth:principleclass "Conflict of Interest Disclosure in Advisory Engagements" ;
proeth:sourcetext "The City Administrator also has previous experiences with a competing firm, Engineer C. Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The conflict of interest disclosure obligation required Engineer C to either decline to provide the critique or affirmatively disclose his competitive interest before doing so; providing the critique without disclosure compounded the ethical violation by depriving the client of information necessary to evaluate the objectivity of the advice" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B's decisions.",
"Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract.",
"The City Administrator also has previous experiences with a competing firm, Engineer C." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T18:27:44.474300"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
20
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T18:12:49.348529+00:00
First case
20
Generated
2026-02-25T18:12:49.348529+00:00
Attributed to
Case 20 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T18:27:44.474300
Generated by
ProEthica Case 20 Extraction