City Administrator Engineering Procurement Authority

@prefix case20: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/20#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case20:City_Administrator_Engineering_Procurement_Authority a proeth:CityAdministratorEngineeringProcurementAuthority, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "City Administrator Engineering Procurement Authority" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case20:Client_Procurement_Process_Integrity_Obligation_Applied_to_City_Administrator, case20:Client_Procurement_Process_Integrity_Obligation_Invoked_By_City_Administrator, case20:Client_Procurement_Process_Integrity_Obligation_Violated_by_City_Administrator, case20:Fairness_in_Professional_Competition_Invoked_By_Engineer_C_and_City_Administrator, case20:Incumbent_Engineer_Knowledge_Requirement_Violated_by_Engineer_C_and_Client_A ; proeth-core:hasObligation case20:City_Administrator_Client_Procurement_Process_Integrity_Obligation_Instance, case20:City_Administrator_Procurement_Process_Integrity_Preservation_Obligation_Instance, case20:Client_Procurement_Process_Integrity_City_Administrator_City_A, case20:Fairness_in_Professional_Competition_Engineer_C_City_Administrator_Procurement ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Non-engineer administrative official', 'authority': 'Coordinates incumbent work and heavily involved in next contract selection', 'prior_relationship': 'Previous experience with competing firm Engineer C'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Non-engineer municipal administrative official who coordinates the incumbent engineer's work, holds significant authority over the next contract selection, has questioned the incumbent's judgment, and improperly solicits a competitor to critique the incumbent's specific decisions." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.95" ; proeth:discoveredincase "20" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T18:10:01.986691+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "20" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T18:10:01.986691+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'coordinator', 'target': 'Engineer B Incumbent Consulting Engineer Under Contract'}", "{'type': 'improper_solicitor', 'target': 'Engineer C Competing Engineer Solicited for Incumbent Critique'}", "{'type': 'procurement_authority', 'target': 'City A Municipal Consulting Engineering Client'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "employer_relationship" ; proeth:roleclass "City Administrator Engineering Procurement Authority" ; proeth:sourcetext "The City Administrator leads the effort for the city to coordinate the work of Engineer B" ; proeth:textreferences "The City Administrator contacts Engineer C to question him on specific issues Engineer B has worked on for the City", "The City Administrator has questioned the judgment of Engineer B on several occasions", "The City Administrator leads the effort for the city to coordinate the work of Engineer B", "The City Administrator will also be heavily involved in the effort to select the consulting firm for the next 3-year contract" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 20 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T18:27:44.471631"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 20 Extraction" .