State Z Licensing Board Rules of Professional Conduct
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#State_Z_Licensing_Board_Rules_of_Professional_Conduct
Properties
Instance of
StateLicensingBoardRulesofProfessionalConduct
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#StateLicensingBoardRulesofProfessionalConduct
Confidence
0.96
Created by
State Z Engineering Licensing Board (unique legislative history)
Document title
State Z Engineering Licensing Board Rules of Professional Conduct
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A
Used in context
Engineer A reviews State Z rules, which are more specific than State Q rules, to evaluate whether XYZ Engineers' practice of not including prior-employer attribution in every paragraph of project descriptions violates the requirement for detailed attribution next to each specific project listing
Version
Current at time of case (with long and unique legislative history)
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer Q finds that the Rules in State Z, which have a long and unique legislative history, are much more specific, indicating in part that 'a licensee who has been an employee of another design firm may not claim unconditional credit for design projects contracted for in the name of a previous employer'
Text references
Engineer Q finds that the Rules in State Z, which have a long and unique legislative history, are much more specific, indicating in part that 'a licensee who has been an employee of another design firm may not claim unconditional credit for design projects contracted for in the name of a previous employer'
The Rules in both states require a licensee who has knowledge or reason to believe that a person or firm has violated those Rules to report such knowledge or belief to the Board of Licensure in writing
any list of such projects must include, next to the specific project listing, detailed information naming the previous firm and the licensee's specific involvement in the project
TTL
@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case19:State_Z_Licensing_Board_Rules_of_Professional_Conduct a proeth:StateLicensingBoardRulesofProfessionalConduct,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "State Z Licensing Board Rules of Professional Conduct" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.96" ;
proeth:createdby "State Z Engineering Licensing Board (unique legislative history)" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "State Z Engineering Licensing Board Rules of Professional Conduct" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:40:21.244011+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:40:21.244011+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "State Licensing Board Rules of Professional Conduct" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer Q finds that the Rules in State Z, which have a long and unique legislative history, are much more specific, indicating in part that 'a licensee who has been an employee of another design firm may not claim unconditional credit for design projects contracted for in the name of a previous employer'" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer Q finds that the Rules in State Z, which have a long and unique legislative history, are much more specific, indicating in part that 'a licensee who has been an employee of another design firm may not claim unconditional credit for design projects contracted for in the name of a previous employer'",
"The Rules in both states require a licensee who has knowledge or reason to believe that a person or firm has violated those Rules to report such knowledge or belief to the Board of Licensure in writing",
"any list of such projects must include, next to the specific project listing, detailed information naming the previous firm and the licensee's specific involvement in the project" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Engineer A reviews State Z rules, which are more specific than State Q rules, to evaluate whether XYZ Engineers' practice of not including prior-employer attribution in every paragraph of project descriptions violates the requirement for detailed attribution next to each specific project listing" ;
proeth:version "Current at time of case (with long and unique legislative history)" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.755163"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
19
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T15:40:21.244011+00:00
First case
19
Generated
2026-02-25T15:40:21.244011+00:00
Attributed to
Case 19 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T15:58:57.755163
Generated by
ProEthica Case 19 Extraction