State Z Licensing Board Regulatory Authority
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#State_Z_Licensing_Board_Regulatory_Authority
Definition
State licensing board in State Z whose rules have a unique legislative history and impose more specific attribution requirements, prohibiting unconditional credit claims for prior-employer projects and requiring detailed attribution next to each specific project listing; potential recipient of Engineer A's mandatory report
Properties
Instance of
Attributes
| type | State professional licensing regulatory body |
| jurisdiction | State Z |
| applicable_rules | Unique legislative history — prohibits unconditional credit for prior-employer projects; requires detailed attribution next to each specific project listing |
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | regulatory_authority_over |
| target | Engineer A Competing Engineering Firm Employee |
| type | regulatory_authority_over |
| target | Engineer B Multi-State Project Manager |
| type | report_recipient_from |
| target | Engineer A Multi-Jurisdiction Ethics Reviewer |
Role category
public_responsibility
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer Q finds that the Rules in State Z, which have a long and unique legislative history, are much more specific, indicating in part that 'a licensee who has been an employee of another design firm may not claim unconditional credit for design projects contracted for in the name of a previous employer'
Text references
Engineer Q finds that the Rules in State Z, which have a long and unique legislative history, are much more specific, indicating in part that 'a licensee who has been an employee of another design firm may not claim unconditional credit for design projects contracted for in the name of a previous employer'
The Rules in both states require a licensee who has knowledge or reason to believe that a person or firm has violated those Rules to report such knowledge or belief to the Board of Licensure in writing
any list of such projects must include, next to the specific project listing, detailed information naming the previous firm and the licensee's specific involvement in the project
TTL
@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case19:State_Z_Licensing_Board_Regulatory_Authority a proeth:ParticipantRole,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "State Z Licensing Board Regulatory Authority" ;
proeth:attributes "{'type': 'State professional licensing regulatory body', 'jurisdiction': 'State Z', 'applicable_rules': 'Unique legislative history — prohibits unconditional credit for prior-employer projects; requires detailed attribution next to each specific project listing'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "State licensing board in State Z whose rules have a unique legislative history and impose more specific attribution requirements, prohibiting unconditional credit claims for prior-employer projects and requiring detailed attribution next to each specific project listing; potential recipient of Engineer A's mandatory report" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:40:32.773954+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:40:32.773954+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'regulatory_authority_over', 'target': 'Engineer A Competing Engineering Firm Employee'}",
"{'type': 'regulatory_authority_over', 'target': 'Engineer B Multi-State Project Manager'}",
"{'type': 'report_recipient_from', 'target': 'Engineer A Multi-Jurisdiction Ethics Reviewer'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ;
proeth:roleclass "Participant Role" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer Q finds that the Rules in State Z, which have a long and unique legislative history, are much more specific, indicating in part that 'a licensee who has been an employee of another design firm may not claim unconditional credit for design projects contracted for in the name of a previous employer'" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer Q finds that the Rules in State Z, which have a long and unique legislative history, are much more specific, indicating in part that 'a licensee who has been an employee of another design firm may not claim unconditional credit for design projects contracted for in the name of a previous employer'",
"The Rules in both states require a licensee who has knowledge or reason to believe that a person or firm has violated those Rules to report such knowledge or belief to the Board of Licensure in writing",
"any list of such projects must include, next to the specific project listing, detailed information naming the previous firm and the licensee's specific involvement in the project" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.758210"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
19
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T15:40:32.773954+00:00
First case
19
Generated
2026-02-25T15:40:32.773954+00:00
Attributed to
Case 19 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T15:58:57.758210
Generated by
ProEthica Case 19 Extraction