State Q Rules of Professional Conduct
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#State_Q_Rules_of_Professional_Conduct
Properties
Instance of
StateLicensingBoardRulesofProfessionalConduct
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#StateLicensingBoardRulesofProfessionalConduct
Confidence
0.92
Created by
State Q Engineering Licensing Board
Document title
State Q Engineering Licensing Board Rules of Professional Conduct
Importance
high
Used by
BER in evaluating Engineer A's reporting obligation in State Q
Used in context
Evaluated to determine whether Engineer B's proposal constituted misrepresentation under State Q's rules; BER found the language similar to NSPE Code and concluded no misrepresentation occurred, so no reporting obligation arose
Source Evidence
Source text
With respect to the obligation to report to the engineering licensing board in State Q, the language presented in the case regarding State Q's Rules appears very similar to the language in the NSPE Code of Ethics.
Text references
Did Engineer B's and XYZ Engineers' presentation 'misrepresent facts concerning…past accomplishments'?
The BER concludes that it would not rise to misrepresentation, and that Engineer A did not have an obligation to report to the engineering licensing board in State Q.
With respect to the obligation to report to the engineering licensing board in State Q, the language presented in the case regarding State Q's Rules appears very similar to the language in the NSPE Code of Ethics.
TTL
@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case19:State_Q_Rules_of_Professional_Conduct a proeth:StateLicensingBoardRulesofProfessionalConduct,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "State Q Rules of Professional Conduct" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:createdby "State Q Engineering Licensing Board" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "State Q Engineering Licensing Board Rules of Professional Conduct" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:41:13.535282+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:41:13.535282+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "State Licensing Board Rules of Professional Conduct" ;
proeth:sourcetext "With respect to the obligation to report to the engineering licensing board in State Q, the language presented in the case regarding State Q's Rules appears very similar to the language in the NSPE Code of Ethics." ;
proeth:textreferences "Did Engineer B's and XYZ Engineers' presentation 'misrepresent facts concerning…past accomplishments'?",
"The BER concludes that it would not rise to misrepresentation, and that Engineer A did not have an obligation to report to the engineering licensing board in State Q.",
"With respect to the obligation to report to the engineering licensing board in State Q, the language presented in the case regarding State Q's Rules appears very similar to the language in the NSPE Code of Ethics." ;
proeth:usedby "BER in evaluating Engineer A's reporting obligation in State Q" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Evaluated to determine whether Engineer B's proposal constituted misrepresentation under State Q's rules; BER found the language similar to NSPE Code and concluded no misrepresentation occurred, so no reporting obligation arose" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.760262"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
19
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T15:41:13.535282+00:00
First case
19
Generated
2026-02-25T15:41:13.535282+00:00
Attributed to
Case 19 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T15:58:57.760262
Generated by
ProEthica Case 19 Extraction