Engineer B State Q Attribution Ambiguity
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#Engineer_B_State_Q_Attribution_Ambiguity
Properties
Instance of
PartialAttributionDisclosureState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PartialAttributionDisclosureState
Active period
From submission of the qualifications proposal through BER evaluation of whether the presentation constituted misrepresentation under State Q rules
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Prospective clients reviewing the proposal
State Q licensing board
XYZ Engineers
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer B's and XYZ Engineers' qualifications proposal presentation of projects completed under prior employment in State Q
Terminated by
BER conclusion that the presentation did not rise to misrepresentation under State Q's rules and Engineer A had no obligation to report in State Q
Triggering event
XYZ Engineers submitted a proposal indicating Engineer B was in responsible charge of listed projects while in previous employment, but did not repeat that qualifier within each specific project description
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
XYZ Engineers' proposal clearly indicated that Engineer B was in responsible charge of certain listed projects while in the previous employment of another firm
Text references
That qualifier was not repeated within the specific descriptions of each of those projects
The BER concludes that it would not rise to misrepresentation, and that Engineer A did not have an obligation to report to the engineering licensing board in State Q
XYZ Engineers' proposal clearly indicated that Engineer B was in responsible charge of certain listed projects while in the previous employment of another firm
the information probably could have been clearer, but did it rise to 'misrepresentation'?
TTL
@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case19:Engineer_B_State_Q_Attribution_Ambiguity a proeth:PartialAttributionDisclosureState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B State Q Attribution Ambiguity" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From submission of the qualifications proposal through BER evaluation of whether the presentation constituted misrepresentation under State Q rules" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Prospective clients reviewing the proposal",
"State Q licensing board",
"XYZ Engineers" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "XYZ Engineers' proposal clearly indicated that Engineer B was in responsible charge of certain listed projects while in the previous employment of another firm" ;
proeth:stateclass "Partial Attribution Disclosure State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer B's and XYZ Engineers' qualifications proposal presentation of projects completed under prior employment in State Q" ;
proeth:terminatedby "BER conclusion that the presentation did not rise to misrepresentation under State Q's rules and Engineer A had no obligation to report in State Q" ;
proeth:textreferences "That qualifier was not repeated within the specific descriptions of each of those projects",
"The BER concludes that it would not rise to misrepresentation, and that Engineer A did not have an obligation to report to the engineering licensing board in State Q",
"XYZ Engineers' proposal clearly indicated that Engineer B was in responsible charge of certain listed projects while in the previous employment of another firm",
"the information probably could have been clearer, but did it rise to 'misrepresentation'?" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "XYZ Engineers submitted a proposal indicating Engineer B was in responsible charge of listed projects while in previous employment, but did not repeat that qualifier within each specific project description" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.762051"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
19
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00
First case
19
Generated
2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00
Attributed to
Case 19 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T15:58:57.762051
Generated by
ProEthica Case 19 Extraction