Engineer A State Z Reporting Obligation

S · State Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#Engineer_A_State_Z_Reporting_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
PeerCompetitorConductReportingObligationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerCompetitorConductReportingObligationState
Active period
From Engineer A's identification of the State Z rule violation through the filing of a report with the State Z licensing board
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
State Z licensing board
XYZ Engineers
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's obligation to report Engineer B's and XYZ Engineers' misconduct to the State Z licensing board
Terminated by
Engineer A's report to the State Z engineering licensing board
Triggering event
Engineer A identified that Engineer B's and XYZ Engineers' proposal failed to meet State Z's specific attribution requirements, constituting misconduct under State Z rules
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
There is an obligation under the NSPE Code of Ethics to report others who 'are believed to be guilty' of unethical or illegal practice to the appropriate authority, in this case, the engineering licensing board in the applicable state

Text references
The BER concludes that Engineer A has a clear obligation to report the misconduct to the engineering licensing board in State Z
There is an obligation under the NSPE Code of Ethics to report others who 'are believed to be guilty' of unethical or illegal practice to the appropriate authority, in this case, the engineering licensing board in the applicable state
TTL
@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case19:Engineer_A_State_Z_Reporting_Obligation a proeth:PeerCompetitorConductReportingObligationState, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A State Z Reporting Obligation" ; proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's identification of the State Z rule violation through the filing of a report with the State Z licensing board" ; proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A", "Engineer B", "State Z licensing board", "XYZ Engineers" ; proeth:conceptCategory "State" ; proeth:confidence "0.92" ; proeth:discoveredincase "19" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:sourcetext "There is an obligation under the NSPE Code of Ethics to report others who 'are believed to be guilty' of unethical or illegal practice to the appropriate authority, in this case, the engineering licensing board in the applicable state" ; proeth:stateclass "Peer Competitor Conduct Reporting Obligation State" ; proeth:subject "Engineer A's obligation to report Engineer B's and XYZ Engineers' misconduct to the State Z licensing board" ; proeth:terminatedby "Engineer A's report to the State Z engineering licensing board" ; proeth:textreferences "The BER concludes that Engineer A has a clear obligation to report the misconduct to the engineering licensing board in State Z", "There is an obligation under the NSPE Code of Ethics to report others who 'are believed to be guilty' of unethical or illegal practice to the appropriate authority, in this case, the engineering licensing board in the applicable state" ; proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A identified that Engineer B's and XYZ Engineers' proposal failed to meet State Z's specific attribution requirements, constituting misconduct under State Z rules" ; proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.762428"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
19
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00
First case
19
Generated
2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00
Attributed to
Case 19 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T15:58:57.762428
Generated by
ProEthica Case 19 Extraction