Engineer A Multi-Jurisdiction Ethics Reviewer

@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case19:Engineer_A_Multi-Jurisdiction_Ethics_Reviewer a proeth:Multi-JurisdictionEngineeringEthicsReviewer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Multi-Jurisdiction Ethics Reviewer" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case19:Honesty_in_Professional_Representations_Invoked_By_XYZ_Engineers_Qualification_Proposals, case19:Jurisdiction-Specific_Ethics_Compliance_Applied_to_Multi-State_Practice, case19:Jurisdiction-Specific_Ethics_Compliance_Obligation_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Multi-State_Review, case19:Proportionality_Analysis_Applied_to_State_Q_Proposal, case19:Qualification_Proposal_Attribution_Integrity_Invoked_By_Engineer_B_XYZ_Engineers_State_Q, case19:Qualification_Proposal_Attribution_Integrity_Invoked_By_Engineer_B_XYZ_Engineers_State_Z ; proeth-core:hasObligation case19:Engineer_A_Multi-Jurisdiction_Ethics_Review_State_Q_State_Z, case19:Engineer_A_Proportionate_Characterization_State_Q_Proposal_Analysis, case19:Multi-Jurisdiction_Ethics_Review_Obligation_Engineer_A_Both_States ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'jurisdictions_reviewed': ['State Q', 'State Z'], 'rules_consulted': ['NSPE Code of Ethics', 'State Q Licensing Board Rules (NCEES Model Rules)', 'State Z Licensing Board Rules']}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Reviews NSPE Code and state licensing board rules of both State Q and State Z to assess whether XYZ Engineers' qualification proposal practices are unethical and whether a mandatory written reporting obligation to both licensing boards has been triggered" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:discoveredincase "19" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:40:32.773954+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:40:32.773954+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'reporting_authority', 'target': 'State Q Licensing Board'}", "{'type': 'reporting_authority', 'target': 'State Z Licensing Board'}", "{'type': 'reviewing_conduct_of', 'target': 'Engineer B Multi-State Project Manager'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ; proeth:roleclass "Multi-Jurisdiction Engineering Ethics Reviewer" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A decides to review the NSPE Code of Ethics and the engineering licensing board law and rules of professional conduct in both states" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A decides to review the NSPE Code of Ethics and the engineering licensing board law and rules of professional conduct in both states", "Engineer Q considers whether this proposal/marketing practice is unethical in accordance with the NSPE Code of Ethics and whether Engineer A has an obligation to report to the two licensing jurisdictions", "The Rules in both states require a licensee who has knowledge or reason to believe that a person or firm has violated those Rules to report such knowledge or belief to the Board of Licensure in writing" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.755834"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .