Engineer A Anonymous Complaint Filing
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#Engineer_A_Anonymous_Complaint_Filing
Properties
Instance of
AnonymousReportingAdequacyState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AnonymousReportingAdequacyState
Active period
From Engineer A's decision to file anonymously through BER evaluation of the complaint's ethical adequacy
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Engineering licensing board
Confidence
0.88
Importance
medium
Subject
Engineer A's anonymous complaint to engineering licensing board regarding Engineer B's misconduct
Terminated by
BER conclusion that anonymous complaint was ethically permissible and satisfied the reporting obligation
Triggering event
Engineer A identified misconduct by Engineer B and filed an anonymous complaint with the engineering licensing board
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A had provided an anonymous complaint to the engineering licensing board regarding the misconduct of Engineer B
Text references
Engineer A had provided an anonymous complaint to the engineering licensing board regarding the misconduct of Engineer B
The BER was tasked with evaluating whether filing the complaint anonymously was unethical
a signed complaint would have been better to facilitate the licensing board's investigation, and fairer to the complainant, but concluded in this case that an anonymous letter was better than no letter at all and was ethical
TTL
@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case19:Engineer_A_Anonymous_Complaint_Filing a proeth:AnonymousReportingAdequacyState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Anonymous Complaint Filing" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's decision to file anonymously through BER evaluation of the complaint's ethical adequacy" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Engineering licensing board" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A had provided an anonymous complaint to the engineering licensing board regarding the misconduct of Engineer B" ;
proeth:stateclass "Anonymous Reporting Adequacy State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's anonymous complaint to engineering licensing board regarding Engineer B's misconduct" ;
proeth:terminatedby "BER conclusion that anonymous complaint was ethically permissible and satisfied the reporting obligation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A had provided an anonymous complaint to the engineering licensing board regarding the misconduct of Engineer B",
"The BER was tasked with evaluating whether filing the complaint anonymously was unethical",
"a signed complaint would have been better to facilitate the licensing board's investigation, and fairer to the complainant, but concluded in this case that an anonymous letter was better than no letter at all and was ethical" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A identified misconduct by Engineer B and filed an anonymous complaint with the engineering licensing board" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.761795"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
19
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00
First case
19
Generated
2026-02-25T15:41:41.300245+00:00
Attributed to
Case 19 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T15:58:57.761795
Generated by
ProEthica Case 19 Extraction