DP5

DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint

DP5

Should Engineer B and XYZ Engineers apply the most stringent applicable jurisdiction's attribution standard — State Z's project-level requirement — as the operative benchmark for all qualification proposals, or is it ethically permissible to calibrate disclosure architecture to each state's minimum rule, accepting that the same proposal structure may comply in State Q while violating State Z?

Engineer B and XYZ Engineers: Jurisdiction-Specific Attribution Rule Compliance Across State Q and State Z

Calibrate proposal attribution architecture to each state's minimum licensing rule, using prefatory-only disclosure where state rules permit it and project-level attribution only where explicitly required

Adopt the most stringent applicable jurisdiction's attribution standard — project-level attribution adjacent to each project description — as the universal benchmark for all qualification proposals regardless of which state they are submitted in

Engineer B / XYZ Engineers