Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement Obligation Invoked by Engineer A
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181#Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Agreement_Obligation_Invoked_by_Engineer_A
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementObligation
Applied to
Technical documentation and design project information reviewed at Engineer B's firm
Balancing with
Confidentiality-Bounded Public Safety Escalation in Peer Review
Public Welfare Paramount
Concrete expression
Engineer A signed a confidentiality agreement as a condition of serving as peer reviewer for Engineer B's firm, obligating Engineer A not to disclose information revealed about the firm during the peer review process, in order to encourage maximum disclosure and build trust between the parties
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Interpretation
The confidentiality agreement is a legitimate and important relational obligation that supports the peer review program's purpose; it is not a mere formality but a substantive ethical commitment that must be weighed seriously against competing obligations
Invoked by
Engineer A Peer Review Safety Violation Discovering Engineer
Tension resolution
The confidentiality obligation is real and weighty but is not absolute; it yields when Engineer A discovers imminent public safety risks that cannot be resolved through direct engagement with Engineer B
Source Evidence
Source text
an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement' in which the peer reviewer agrees not to disclose information that is revealed to the peer reviewer about the firm being reviewed during the course of the peer review process
Text references
Firms being peer reviewed should be encouraged to provide as much pertinent detailed information to the peer reviewer to allow the peer reviewer the opportunity to perform a thorough evaluation of the firm, and confidentiality helps to assure that the maximum amount of disclosure will occur.
an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement' in which the peer reviewer agrees not to disclose information that is revealed to the peer reviewer about the firm being reviewed during the course of the peer review process
confidentiality helps build trust between the parties involved in the peer review process and promotes an atmosphere that will improve the likelihood that the peer review process will be mutually productive and ultimately successful
TTL
@prefix case181: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case181:Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Agreement_Obligation_Invoked_by_Engineer_A a proeth:PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement Obligation Invoked by Engineer A" ;
proeth:appliedto "Technical documentation and design project information reviewed at Engineer B's firm" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Confidentiality-Bounded Public Safety Escalation in Peer Review",
"Public Welfare Paramount" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A signed a confidentiality agreement as a condition of serving as peer reviewer for Engineer B's firm, obligating Engineer A not to disclose information revealed about the firm during the peer review process, in order to encourage maximum disclosure and build trust between the parties" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "181" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:15:02.559197+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "181" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:15:02.559197+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The confidentiality agreement is a legitimate and important relational obligation that supports the peer review program's purpose; it is not a mere formality but a substantive ethical commitment that must be weighed seriously against competing obligations" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Peer Review Safety Violation Discovering Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement Obligation" ;
proeth:sourcetext "an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement' in which the peer reviewer agrees not to disclose information that is revealed to the peer reviewer about the firm being reviewed during the course of the peer review process" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The confidentiality obligation is real and weighty but is not absolute; it yields when Engineer A discovers imminent public safety risks that cannot be resolved through direct engagement with Engineer B" ;
proeth:textreferences "Firms being peer reviewed should be encouraged to provide as much pertinent detailed information to the peer reviewer to allow the peer reviewer the opportunity to perform a thorough evaluation of the firm, and confidentiality helps to assure that the maximum amount of disclosure will occur.",
"an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement' in which the peer reviewer agrees not to disclose information that is revealed to the peer reviewer about the firm being reviewed during the course of the peer review process",
"confidentiality helps build trust between the parties involved in the peer review process and promotes an atmosphere that will improve the likelihood that the peer review process will be mutually productive and ultimately successful" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 181 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:25:33.353374"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 181 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
181
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T09:15:02.559197+00:00
First case
181
Generated
2026-03-01T09:15:02.559197+00:00
Attributed to
Case 181 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T09:25:33.353374
Generated by
ProEthica Case 181 Extraction