Engineer A Competing Duties — Confidentiality vs. Safety Reporting
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181#Engineer_A_Competing_Duties_—_Confidentiality_vs._Safety_Reporting
Properties
Instance of
Active period
From the moment of safety violation discovery, persisting until Engineer A resolves the conflict through a prioritized course of action
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Engineer B's firm
Peer review program organizers
Public
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's simultaneous obligation to honor the signed confidentiality agreement and the paramount professional duty to protect public health, safety, and welfare through disclosure
Terminated by
Engineer A's decision to act — either by disclosing to appropriate authorities (prioritizing safety) or by seeking program-level guidance on reconciling the conflict
Triggering event
Discovery of potential safety code violations during a peer review conducted under a binding confidentiality agreement
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A agrees not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms
Text references
Engineer A agrees not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms
Engineer A discovers that Engineer B's work may be in violation of state and local safety code requirements and could endanger public health, safety, and welfare
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181#Engineer_A_Competing_Duties_—_Confidentiality_vs._Safety_Reporting> a proeth:CompetingDutiesState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Competing Duties — Confidentiality vs. Safety Reporting" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the moment of safety violation discovery, persisting until Engineer A resolves the conflict through a prioritized course of action" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Engineer B's firm",
"Peer review program organizers",
"Public" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "181" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:07:02.564814+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "181" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:07:02.564814+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A agrees not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms" ;
proeth:stateclass "Competing Duties State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's simultaneous obligation to honor the signed confidentiality agreement and the paramount professional duty to protect public health, safety, and welfare through disclosure" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineer A's decision to act — either by disclosing to appropriate authorities (prioritizing safety) or by seeking program-level guidance on reconciling the conflict" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A agrees not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms",
"Engineer A discovers that Engineer B's work may be in violation of state and local safety code requirements and could endanger public health, safety, and welfare" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Discovery of potential safety code violations during a peer review conducted under a binding confidentiality agreement" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 181 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:25:33.348440"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 181 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
181
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T09:07:02.564814+00:00
First case
181
Generated
2026-03-01T09:07:02.564814+00:00
Attributed to
Case 181 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T09:25:33.348440
Generated by
ProEthica Case 181 Extraction