DP6
Individual
acb56976
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181#DP6
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP6
Decision Question
Upon discovering potential safety code violations during the peer review, should Engineer A proceed directly to notifying Engineer B under the standard sequential escalation model without a formal documented risk assessment, conduct and document a severity-and-imminence assessment first to determine which escalation pathway applies, or apply a uniform immediate-reporting standard to all discovered violations regardless of assessed severity?
Focus
Engineer A Severity and Imminence Assessment Obligation: Whether Engineer A must conduct and document a formal severity-and-imminence assessment of the discovered safety risk at the moment of discovery, and how that assessment determines which escalation pathway — sequential collegial notification or immediate regulatory reporting — is ethically required.
Option1
Before taking any escalation action, conduct and document a formal severity-and-imminence assessment identifying the specific code discrepancies, the design elements involved, the applicable safety code provisions, and the potential harm pathway — then select the escalation pathway (sequential collegial notification or immediate regulatory reporting) calibrated to the assessed level of risk.
Option2
Proceed directly to notifying Engineer B under the standard sequential escalation model without conducting a separate documented risk assessment, on the grounds that the 'may be in violation' standard uniformly triggers the collegial-first pathway and that a formal assessment introduces delay that is itself potentially harmful when a violation has already been identified.
Option3
Report all discovered potential safety code violations directly to proper authorities without a severity-and-imminence assessment, on the grounds that any violation of state and local safety codes constitutes a sufficient public safety risk to trigger the paramount reporting duty, and that calibrating the response to assessed severity introduces subjective judgment that could be used to rationalize inaction.
Role Label
Engineer A Peer Review Safety Violation Discovering Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_181: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181#DP6> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP6" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
acb56976ec43c1a7...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-03-01T09:39:17.700470
Generated By
ProEthica Case 181 Extraction