ClientConfidentialityPublicSafetyBalancingFramework-CaseInstance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181#ClientConfidentialityPublicSafetyBalancingFramework-CaseInstance
Properties
Instance of
ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
Confidence
0.95
Created by
Professional engineering ethics bodies
Document title
Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A
Used in context
This decision framework directly applies to Engineer A's dilemma: the signed confidentiality agreement creates a duty of non-disclosure, but the discovery of potential safety code violations endangering public health, safety, and welfare triggers the paramount obligation to protect the public. The framework guides how Engineer A must weigh and resolve these competing obligations.
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A agrees not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms
Text references
Engineer A agrees not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms
Engineer A discovers that Engineer B's work may be in violation of state and local safety code requirements and could endanger public health, safety, and welfare
TTL
@prefix case181: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/181#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case181:ClientConfidentialityPublicSafetyBalancingFramework-CaseInstance a proeth:ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "ClientConfidentialityPublicSafetyBalancingFramework-CaseInstance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:createdby "Professional engineering ethics bodies" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "181" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:07:06.285959+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "181" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:07:06.285959+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A agrees not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A agrees not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms",
"Engineer A discovers that Engineer B's work may be in violation of state and local safety code requirements and could endanger public health, safety, and welfare" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A" ;
proeth:usedincontext "This decision framework directly applies to Engineer A's dilemma: the signed confidentiality agreement creates a duty of non-disclosure, but the discovery of potential safety code violations endangering public health, safety, and welfare triggers the paramount obligation to protect the public. The framework guides how Engineer A must weigh and resolve these competing obligations." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 181 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:25:33.348985"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 181 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
181
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T09:07:06.285959+00:00
First case
181
Generated
2026-03-01T09:07:06.285959+00:00
Attributed to
Case 181 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T09:25:33.348985
Generated by
ProEthica Case 181 Extraction