Engineer A Multi-Party Litigation Expert

@prefix case179: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case179:Engineer_A_Multi-Party_Litigation_Expert a proeth:Multi-PartyLitigationExpertEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Multi-Party Litigation Expert" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case179:Absolute_Loyalty_Non-Extension_to_Former_Client_ABC_Manufacturing, case179:Adversarial_Context_Objectivity_Maintained_By_Engineer_A, case179:Engineer_Non-Advocate_Objectivity_Maintained_Across_Multi-Party_Engagements, case179:Former_Client_Adversarial_Participation_Assessment_in_Unrelated_Matter, case179:Multi-Matter_Multi-Party_Forensic_Engagement_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_for_Engineer_A_History, case179:Unrelated_Matter_Adverse_Engagement_Permissibility_Invoked_By_Engineer_A ; proeth-core:hasObligation case179:Engineer_A_Conflict_of_Interest_Appearance_Non-Equivalence_to_Actual_Conflict_Recognition_in_Multi-Party_Litigation, case179:Engineer_A_Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Evolution_Compliance_in_Multi-Party_Litigation_History, case179:Engineer_A_Engineer_Autonomy_Non-Subordination_to_Legal_Profession_Bar_Analogy_in_Product_Liability_Engagement, case179:Engineer_A_Expert_Witness_Engineering_Non-Advocate_Objectivity_Across_Multi-Party_Engagements, case179:Engineer_A_Former_Client_Adversarial_Proceeding_Consent_Prerequisite_Non-Application_Unrelated_Matter, case179:Engineer_A_Individual_Engineering_Judgment_Autonomy_Preservation_in_Adverse_Former_Client_Engagement_Decision, case179:Engineer_A_Multi-Matter_Forensic_Engagement_Prior_Relationship_Proactive_Disclosure_to_Attorney_X, case179:Engineer_A_Multi-Matter_Prior_Relationship_Proactive_Disclosure_to_ABC_Manufacturing_Second_Retention, case179:Engineer_A_Multi-Matter_Prior_Relationship_Proactive_Disclosure_to_Attorney_X, case179:Engineer_A_Non-Absolute_Former_Client_Loyalty_Boundary_Recognition_ABC_Manufacturing_Product_Liability, case179:Engineer_A_Non-Absolute_Former_Client_Loyalty_Recognition_in_ABC_Manufacturing_Adverse_Engagement, case179:Engineer_A_Non-Advocate_Objectivity_Maintained_Across_ABC_Manufacturing_and_Attorney_X_Engagements, case179:Engineer_A_Opposing_Counsel_Impropriety_Implication_Professional_Independence_Assertion_in_Cross-Examination, case179:Engineer_A_Opposing_Counsel_Impropriety_Implication_Resistance_Cross-Examination, case179:Engineer_A_Switching_Sides_Prohibition_Non-Application_Recognition_Unrelated_Product_Liability_Matter, case179:Engineer_A_Unrelated_Matter_Adverse_Engagement_Permissibility_Assertion_ABC_Manufacturing_Product_Liability, case179:Engineer_A_Unrelated_Matter_Adverse_Forensic_Engagement_Permissibility_Assertion_in_ABC_Manufacturing_Product_Liability_Matter ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer (implied by expert retention)', 'specialty': 'Area of expertise relevant to patent and product liability matters', 'engagement_count': 3, 'parties_served': ['ABC Manufacturing (defense/patent)', 'Attorney X plaintiff (product liability against ABC Manufacturing)', 'ABC Manufacturing (defense/patent, second matter)']}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Engineer A was retained across three separate, unrelated litigation matters — twice by ABC Manufacturing (patent litigation) and once by Attorney X representing a plaintiff against ABC Manufacturing (product liability). During cross-examination, opposing counsel questioned whether these multiple engagements on both sides of litigation with the same company constituted improper conduct, raising issues of professional independence and objectivity." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.97" ; proeth:discoveredincase "179" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T06:50:27.451338+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "179" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T06:50:27.451338+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'adversarial_scrutiny', 'target': 'Opposing Counsel at Trial'}", "{'type': 'client', 'target': 'ABC Manufacturing (first patent matter)'}", "{'type': 'client', 'target': 'ABC Manufacturing (second patent matter)'}", "{'type': 'client', 'target': 'Attorney X / Plaintiff (product liability matter)'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleclass "Multi-Party Litigation Expert Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A was retained by ABC Manufacturing for the purpose of reviewing documents to form an opinion in a patent litigation matter" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A was again retained by ABC Manufacturing in a different patent litigation matter", "Engineer A was retained by ABC Manufacturing for the purpose of reviewing documents to form an opinion in a patent litigation matter", "Engineer A was retained by Attorney X who represented a plaintiff in product liability litigation against ABC Manufacturing", "opposing counsel questions Engineer A's previous relationship both in defense of and in litigation with ABC Manufacturing, implying that by providing those services, Engineer A was acting improperly" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 179 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:10:12.473745"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 179 Extraction" .