Engineer A Multi-Party Litigation Expert
Individual
596ef08e
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#Engineer_A_Multi-Party_Litigation_Expert
Definition
Engineer A was retained across three separate, unrelated litigation matters — twice by ABC Manufacturing (patent litigation) and once by Attorney X representing a plaintiff against ABC Manufacturing (product liability). During cross-examination, opposing counsel questioned whether these multiple engagements on both sides of litigation with the same company constituted improper conduct, raising issues of professional independence and objectivity.
Properties
Parent
Multi-PartyLitigationExpertEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Multi-PartyLitigationExpertEngineer
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer (implied by expert retention) |
| specialty | Area of expertise relevant to patent and product liability matters |
| engagement_count | 3 |
| parties_served | ['ABC Manufacturing (defense/patent)', 'Attorney X plaintiff (product liability against ABC Manufacturing)', 'ABC Manufacturing (defense/patent, second matter)'] |
Concept Category
Role
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | adversarial_scrutiny |
| target | Opposing Counsel at Trial |
| type | client |
| target | ABC Manufacturing (first patent matter) |
| type | client |
| target | ABC Manufacturing (second patent matter) |
| type | client |
| target | Attorney X / Plaintiff (product liability matter) |
Role Category
provider_client
Role Class
Multi-Party Litigation Expert Engineer
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer A was retained by ABC Manufacturing for the purpose of reviewing documents to form an opinion in a patent litigation matter
Text References
Engineer A was again retained by ABC Manufacturing in a different patent litigation matter
Engineer A was retained by ABC Manufacturing for the purpose of reviewing documents to form an opinion in a patent litigation matter
Engineer A was retained by Attorney X who represented a plaintiff in product liability litigation against ABC Manufacturing
opposing counsel questions Engineer A's previous relationship both in defense of and in litigation with ABC Manufacturing, implying that by providing those services, Engineer A was acting improperly
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_179: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#Engineer_A_Multi-Party_Litigation_Expert> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Multi-Party Litigation Expert" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Multi-PartyLitigationExpertEngineer> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
596ef08e6a8a3f30...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
179
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T06:50:27.451338+00:00
First Case
179
Generated
2026-03-01T06:50:27.451338+00:00
Attributed To
Case 179 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:10:12.473745
Generated By
ProEthica Case 179 Extraction