Engineer A Expert Independence in Adversarial Context
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#Engineer_A_Expert_Independence_in_Adversarial_Context
Properties
Instance of
EngineerNon-AdvocateExpertIndependenceState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerNon-AdvocateExpertIndependenceState
Active period
Throughout Engineer A's forensic expert engagements in adversarial proceedings
Affected parties
Courts
Engineer A
Opposing parties
Retaining parties
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's role as expert in adversarial legal proceedings while maintaining engineering objectivity
Terminated by
Conclusion of adversarial proceedings
Triggering event
Engineer A's engagement as expert witness/consultant in adversarial legal matters involving former clients' opponents
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
unlike attorneys, they are not 'advocates' in rendering their professional services
Text references
engineers must analyze technical matters, weighing all appropriate considerations
they should not be expected to compromise their professional independence and autonomy
unlike attorneys, they are not 'advocates' in rendering their professional services
TTL
@prefix case179: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case179:Engineer_A_Expert_Independence_in_Adversarial_Context a proeth:EngineerNon-AdvocateExpertIndependenceState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Expert Independence in Adversarial Context" ;
proeth:activeperiod "Throughout Engineer A's forensic expert engagements in adversarial proceedings" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Courts",
"Engineer A",
"Opposing parties",
"Retaining parties" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "179" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T06:52:15.072528+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "179" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T06:52:15.072528+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "unlike attorneys, they are not 'advocates' in rendering their professional services" ;
proeth:stateclass "Engineer Non-Advocate Expert Independence State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's role as expert in adversarial legal proceedings while maintaining engineering objectivity" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Conclusion of adversarial proceedings" ;
proeth:textreferences "engineers must analyze technical matters, weighing all appropriate considerations",
"they should not be expected to compromise their professional independence and autonomy",
"unlike attorneys, they are not 'advocates' in rendering their professional services" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's engagement as expert witness/consultant in adversarial legal matters involving former clients' opponents" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 179 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:10:12.475098"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 179 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
179
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T06:52:15.072528+00:00
First case
179
Generated
2026-03-01T06:52:15.072528+00:00
Attributed to
Case 179 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:10:12.475098
Generated by
ProEthica Case 179 Extraction