BER-Case-Precedent-Expert-Witness-Dual-Role
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#BER-Case-Precedent-Expert-Witness-Dual-Role
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.78
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case Precedent on Expert Witness Dual/Sequential Roles
Importance
medium
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Used in context
Prior BER decisions on expert witness conduct, objectivity, and conflict of interest in litigation contexts provide analogical reasoning patterns for evaluating whether Engineer A's sequential service for and against ABC Manufacturing is ethically permissible
Source Evidence
Source text
opposing counsel questions Engineer A's previous relationship both in defense of and in litigation with ABC Manufacturing, implying that by providing those services, Engineer A was acting improperly
Text references
opposing counsel questions Engineer A's previous relationship both in defense of and in litigation with ABC Manufacturing, implying that by providing those services, Engineer A was acting improperly
TTL
@prefix case179: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case179:BER-Case-Precedent-Expert-Witness-Dual-Role a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER-Case-Precedent-Expert-Witness-Dual-Role" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.78" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "179" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case Precedent on Expert Witness Dual/Sequential Roles" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T06:50:17.642767+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "179" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T06:50:17.642767+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "opposing counsel questions Engineer A's previous relationship both in defense of and in litigation with ABC Manufacturing, implying that by providing those services, Engineer A was acting improperly" ;
proeth:textreferences "opposing counsel questions Engineer A's previous relationship both in defense of and in litigation with ABC Manufacturing, implying that by providing those services, Engineer A was acting improperly" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Prior BER decisions on expert witness conduct, objectivity, and conflict of interest in litigation contexts provide analogical reasoning patterns for evaluating whether Engineer A's sequential service for and against ABC Manufacturing is ethically permissible" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 179 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:10:12.470806"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 179 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
179
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T06:50:17.642767+00:00
First case
179
Generated
2026-03-01T06:50:17.642767+00:00
Attributed to
Case 179 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:10:12.470806
Generated by
ProEthica Case 179 Extraction