BER-Case-Precedent-Expert-Witness-Dual-Role
Individual
554918a2
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#BER-Case-Precedent-Expert-Witness-Dual-Role
Properties
Parent
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.78
Createdby
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Documenttitle
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case Precedent on Expert Witness Dual/Sequential Roles
Importance
medium
Resourceclass
BER Case Precedent
Usedby
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Usedincontext
Prior BER decisions on expert witness conduct, objectivity, and conflict of interest in litigation contexts provide analogical reasoning patterns for evaluating whether Engineer A's sequential service for and against ABC Manufacturing is ethically permissible
Source Evidence
Source Text
opposing counsel questions Engineer A's previous relationship both in defense of and in litigation with ABC Manufacturing, implying that by providing those services, Engineer A was acting improperly
Text References
opposing counsel questions Engineer A's previous relationship both in defense of and in litigation with ABC Manufacturing, implying that by providing those services, Engineer A was acting improperly
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_179: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#BER-Case-Precedent-Expert-Witness-Dual-Role> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER-Case-Precedent-Expert-Witness-Dual-Role" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BERCasePrecedent> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
554918a2299cba4e...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
179
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T06:50:17.642767+00:00
First Case
179
Generated
2026-03-01T06:50:17.642767+00:00
Attributed To
Case 179 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:10:12.470806
Generated By
ProEthica Case 179 Extraction