ABC Manufacturing Repeat Litigation Client
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#ABC_Manufacturing_Repeat_Litigation_Client
Definition
ABC Manufacturing retained Engineer A twice for patent litigation review and was the adverse party in the product liability matter in which Engineer A was retained by the plaintiff's attorney. The repeat-client relationship became the subject of opposing counsel's cross-examination, raising questions about Engineer A's independence.
Properties
Instance of
RepeatLitigationClientManufacturingCompany
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#RepeatLitigationClientManufacturingCompany
Attributes
| entity_type | Corporate manufacturing company |
| litigation_types | ['Patent litigation (two matters)', 'Product liability (adverse party)'] |
| retention_count | 2 |
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | adverse_party_to |
| target | Attorney X Plaintiff-Side Client |
| type | client_of |
| target | Engineer A Multi-Party Litigation Expert |
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A was retained by ABC Manufacturing for the purpose of reviewing documents to form an opinion in a patent litigation matter
Text references
Engineer A was again retained by ABC Manufacturing in a different patent litigation matter not related to either of the proceeding events
Engineer A was retained by ABC Manufacturing for the purpose of reviewing documents to form an opinion in a patent litigation matter
TTL
@prefix case179: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/179#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case179:ABC_Manufacturing_Repeat_Litigation_Client a proeth:RepeatLitigationClientManufacturingCompany,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "ABC Manufacturing Repeat Litigation Client" ;
proeth:attributes "{'entity_type': 'Corporate manufacturing company', 'litigation_types': ['Patent litigation (two matters)', 'Product liability (adverse party)'], 'retention_count': 2}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "ABC Manufacturing retained Engineer A twice for patent litigation review and was the adverse party in the product liability matter in which Engineer A was retained by the plaintiff's attorney. The repeat-client relationship became the subject of opposing counsel's cross-examination, raising questions about Engineer A's independence." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "179" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T06:50:27.451338+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "179" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T06:50:27.451338+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'adverse_party_to', 'target': 'Attorney X Plaintiff-Side Client'}",
"{'type': 'client_of', 'target': 'Engineer A Multi-Party Litigation Expert'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Repeat Litigation Client Manufacturing Company" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A was retained by ABC Manufacturing for the purpose of reviewing documents to form an opinion in a patent litigation matter" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A was again retained by ABC Manufacturing in a different patent litigation matter not related to either of the proceeding events",
"Engineer A was retained by ABC Manufacturing for the purpose of reviewing documents to form an opinion in a patent litigation matter" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 179 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:10:12.470953"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 179 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
179
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T06:50:27.451338+00:00
First case
179
Generated
2026-03-01T06:50:27.451338+00:00
Attributed to
Case 179 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:10:12.470953
Generated by
ProEthica Case 179 Extraction