Engineer A Speculative Elevated Storage Tank Work Non-Entitlement Acknowledgment
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/178#Engineer_A_Speculative_Elevated_Storage_Tank_Work_Non-Entitlement_Acknowledgment
Properties
Instance of
SpeculativeContributionNon-EntitlementAcknowledgmentObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SpeculativeContributionNon-EntitlementAcknowledgmentObligation
Case context
Engineer A performed elevated storage tank work beyond the contracted scope; Clover City indicated it would consider awarding him an independent design contract; the ethical question is whether this out-of-scope work creates any entitlement.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to recognize and acknowledge that his out-of-scope, speculative work on the elevated storage tank portion of the water treatment report — performed without a separate contract — did not create an entitlement to the subsequent elevated storage tank design contract, and to refrain from representing or treating that contribution as a basis for claiming preferential selection.
Temporal scope
When Engineer A solicited or accepted the elevated storage tank design contract from Clover City independently
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Informal Pre-Award Commitment for Tank Design State
derivedFromPrinciple
Speculative Work Non-Entitlement Applied to Elevated Storage Tank Out-of-Scope Work
Source Evidence
Source text
Those aspects of the report that dealt with the elevated storage tank were not part of the scope of work originally negotiated between ABC and Clover City and no contract exists between the city and ABC for the design of the elevated storage tank.
Text references
Clover City is impressed by Engineer A's initiative on this project.
The city indicates that it would consider a city retainer contract and also a contract for the design of the elevated storage tank.
Those aspects of the report that dealt with the elevated storage tank were not part of the scope of work originally negotiated between ABC and Clover City and no contract exists between the city and ABC for the design of the elevated storage tank.
TTL
@prefix case178: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/178#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case178:Engineer_A_Speculative_Elevated_Storage_Tank_Work_Non-Entitlement_Acknowledgment a proeth:SpeculativeContributionNon-EntitlementAcknowledgmentObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Speculative Elevated Storage Tank Work Non-Entitlement Acknowledgment" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case178:Informal_Pre-Award_Commitment_for_Tank_Design_State ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A performed elevated storage tank work beyond the contracted scope; Clover City indicated it would consider awarding him an independent design contract; the ethical question is whether this out-of-scope work creates any entitlement." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case178:Speculative_Work_Non-Entitlement_Applied_to_Elevated_Storage_Tank_Out-of-Scope_Work ;
proeth:discoveredincase "178" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T08:29:53.222093+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "178" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T08:29:53.222093+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Speculative Contribution Non-Entitlement Acknowledgment Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to recognize and acknowledge that his out-of-scope, speculative work on the elevated storage tank portion of the water treatment report — performed without a separate contract — did not create an entitlement to the subsequent elevated storage tank design contract, and to refrain from representing or treating that contribution as a basis for claiming preferential selection." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Those aspects of the report that dealt with the elevated storage tank were not part of the scope of work originally negotiated between ABC and Clover City and no contract exists between the city and ABC for the design of the elevated storage tank." ;
proeth:temporalscope "When Engineer A solicited or accepted the elevated storage tank design contract from Clover City independently" ;
proeth:textreferences "Clover City is impressed by Engineer A's initiative on this project.",
"The city indicates that it would consider a city retainer contract and also a contract for the design of the elevated storage tank.",
"Those aspects of the report that dealt with the elevated storage tank were not part of the scope of work originally negotiated between ABC and Clover City and no contract exists between the city and ABC for the design of the elevated storage tank." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 178 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T08:48:26.013771"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 178 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
178
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T08:29:53.222093+00:00
First case
178
Generated
2026-03-01T08:29:53.222093+00:00
Attributed to
Case 178 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T08:48:26.013771
Generated by
ProEthica Case 178 Extraction