Engineer A Out-of-Scope Elevated Storage Tank Work Non-Entitlement Recognition

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/178#Engineer_A_Out-of-Scope_Elevated_Storage_Tank_Work_Non-Entitlement_Recognition
Properties
Instance of
SpeculativeContributionNon-EntitlementAcknowledgmentObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SpeculativeContributionNon-EntitlementAcknowledgmentObligation
Case context
Engineer A performed out-of-scope work on the elevated storage tank as part of the water treatment plant expansion report for Clover City while employed at ABC; this work was not separately contracted.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.82
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to recognize that his out-of-scope work on the elevated storage tank portion of the water treatment report — performed without a separate contract — did not create an entitlement to subsequent contract awards from Clover City, and to refrain from treating or representing this speculative contribution as a basis for claiming preferential selection.
Temporal scope
At the time of soliciting Clover City's business after departure from ABC
Source Evidence
Source text
There was no formal written agreement between Engineer A and ABC that would address the issue of whether and under what terms Engineer A could compete with ABC after departing from ABC

Text references
There was no formal written agreement between Engineer A and ABC that would address the issue of whether and under what terms Engineer A could compete with ABC after departing from ABC
TTL
@prefix case178: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/178#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case178:Engineer_A_Out-of-Scope_Elevated_Storage_Tank_Work_Non-Entitlement_Recognition a proeth:SpeculativeContributionNon-EntitlementAcknowledgmentObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Out-of-Scope Elevated Storage Tank Work Non-Entitlement Recognition" ; proeth-core:competesWith case178:Engineer_A_Elevated_Storage_Tank_Work_Attribution_in_Independent_Solicitation ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case178:Elevated_Storage_Tank_Out-of-Scope_Work_State ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer A performed out-of-scope work on the elevated storage tank as part of the water treatment plant expansion report for Clover City while employed at ABC; this work was not separately contracted." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.82" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case178:Speculative_Work_Non-Entitlement_Applied_to_Elevated_Storage_Tank_Out-of-Scope_Work ; proeth:discoveredincase "178" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T08:38:32.552396+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "178" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T08:38:32.552396+00:00" ; proeth:importance "medium" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Speculative Contribution Non-Entitlement Acknowledgment Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to recognize that his out-of-scope work on the elevated storage tank portion of the water treatment report — performed without a separate contract — did not create an entitlement to subsequent contract awards from Clover City, and to refrain from treating or representing this speculative contribution as a basis for claiming preferential selection." ; proeth:sourcetext "There was no formal written agreement between Engineer A and ABC that would address the issue of whether and under what terms Engineer A could compete with ABC after departing from ABC" ; proeth:temporalscope "At the time of soliciting Clover City's business after departure from ABC" ; proeth:textreferences "There was no formal written agreement between Engineer A and ABC that would address the issue of whether and under what terms Engineer A could compete with ABC after departing from ABC" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 178 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T08:48:26.023289"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 178 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
178
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T08:38:32.552396+00:00
First case
178
Generated
2026-03-01T08:38:32.552396+00:00
Attributed to
Case 178 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T08:48:26.023289
Generated by
ProEthica Case 178 Extraction