Private Developer Fee-Paying Developer Subject to City Inspection

@prefix case177: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case177:Private_Developer_Fee-Paying_Developer_Subject_to_City_Inspection a proeth:Fee-PayingDeveloperSubjecttoCityInspection, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Private Developer Fee-Paying Developer Subject to City Inspection" ; proeth:attributes "{'entity_type': 'Private land developer', 'regulatory_obligation': 'Submit plans for city review and approval', 'fee_obligation': \"Pay city's expenses for plan review and construction inspection\", 'independent_inspection_obligation': 'Retain separate inspection for own interest protection', 'dual_relationship_risk': 'Potential private client of same firm conducting city inspection'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Private developers are required by ordinance to submit plans for city review, pay for Firm A's plan review and construction inspection on the city's behalf, and separately retain independent inspection services for their own protection — while simultaneously being potential private clients of Firm A." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:discoveredincase "177" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:08:00.321233+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "177" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:08:00.321233+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'funds_inspection_by', 'target': 'Firm A'}", "{'type': 'must_separately_retain', 'target': 'Independent inspection services'}", "{'type': 'potential_private_client_of', 'target': 'Firm A'}", "{'type': 'regulated_by', 'target': 'City'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleclass "Fee-Paying Developer Subject to City Inspection" ; proeth:sourcetext "private developers are required to submit plans to the city for review and approval" ; proeth:textreferences "The developer must pay for separate inspection services in order to protect his interests", "The developer must pay the city's expenses for having Firm A review the drawings", "openly telling prospective clients that they can save 50% on inspection costs by using their firm", "private developers are required to submit plans to the city for review and approval", "the developer must also pay for inspection services, to be provided by Firm A on the city's behalf" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 177 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:35:05.768824"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 177 Extraction" .