Firm A Multi-Hat Adequate Representation Impossibility
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Firm_A_Multi-Hat_Adequate_Representation_Impossibility
Properties
Instance of
Multi-HatDual-ClientAdequateRepresentationImpossibilityRecognitionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Multi-HatDual-ClientAdequateRepresentationImpossibilityRecognitionObligation
Case context
The Board found that Firm A's simultaneous roles as developer designer, city plan reviewer, and city inspector created a conflict so fundamental that adequate representation of all clients was impossible.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Firm A
Obligation statement
Firm A was obligated to recognize that wearing the multiple simultaneous hats of private developer designer, city plan reviewer, and city construction inspector made adequate representation of the separate and sometimes differing interests of all clients impossible, and to structurally separate these incompatible roles.
Temporal scope
At the time of accepting and throughout the concurrent engagements
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Firm A Multi-Role Structural Conflict — Design Review and Inspection for Same Parties
derivedFromPrinciple
Non-Self-Serving Obligation Violated by Firm A Marketing Conduct
Source Evidence
Source text
The Board cannot see how an engineer can wear the multitude of hats herein described and still represent the best interest of his clients.
Text references
The Board cannot see how an engineer can wear the multitude of hats herein described and still represent the best interest of his clients.
We cannot see how Firm A can adequately represent the separate and sometimes differing interests of its clients under the facts presented.
TTL
@prefix case177: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case177:Firm_A_Multi-Hat_Adequate_Representation_Impossibility a proeth:Multi-HatDual-ClientAdequateRepresentationImpossibilityRecognitionObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Firm A Multi-Hat Adequate Representation Impossibility" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Firm_A_Multi-Role_Structural_Conflict_—_Design_Review_and_Inspection_for_Same_Parties> ;
proeth:casecontext "The Board found that Firm A's simultaneous roles as developer designer, city plan reviewer, and city inspector created a conflict so fundamental that adequate representation of all clients was impossible." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case177:Non-Self-Serving_Obligation_Violated_by_Firm_A_Marketing_Conduct ;
proeth:discoveredincase "177" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "177" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Firm A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Multi-Hat Dual-Client Adequate Representation Impossibility Recognition Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Firm A was obligated to recognize that wearing the multiple simultaneous hats of private developer designer, city plan reviewer, and city construction inspector made adequate representation of the separate and sometimes differing interests of all clients impossible, and to structurally separate these incompatible roles." ;
proeth:sourcetext "The Board cannot see how an engineer can wear the multitude of hats herein described and still represent the best interest of his clients." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of accepting and throughout the concurrent engagements" ;
proeth:textreferences "The Board cannot see how an engineer can wear the multitude of hats herein described and still represent the best interest of his clients.",
"We cannot see how Firm A can adequately represent the separate and sometimes differing interests of its clients under the facts presented." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 177 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:35:05.763056"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 177 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
177
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00
First case
177
Generated
2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00
Attributed to
Case 177 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T09:35:05.763056
Generated by
ProEthica Case 177 Extraction