Firm A Developer-Compensated Public Review and Inspection Services
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Firm_A_Developer-Compensated_Public_Review_and_Inspection_Services
Properties
Instance of
Compensated-by-Regulated-PartyPublicReviewConflictState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Compensated-by-Regulated-PartyPublicReviewConflictState
Active period
Throughout Firm A's engagement in developer-compensated city review and inspection
Affected parties
City
Firm A
Private developers
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Firm A's receipt of compensation from developers for review and inspection services rendered on behalf of the city
Terminated by
Not terminated within the case
Triggering event
Firm A accepting compensation from developers for services whose beneficiary is the city
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
We are particular troubled by the fact that Firm A is expected to perform review and inspection services for one client while being compensated for those services by another client
Text references
We are particular troubled by the fact that Firm A is expected to perform review and inspection services for one client while being compensated for those services by another client
reviews those drawings at developer expense for the benefit of the city, and also performs inspection services at developer expense for the benefit of the city
TTL
@prefix case177: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case177:Firm_A_Developer-Compensated_Public_Review_and_Inspection_Services a proeth:Compensated-by-Regulated-PartyPublicReviewConflictState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Firm A Developer-Compensated Public Review and Inspection Services" ;
proeth:activeperiod "Throughout Firm A's engagement in developer-compensated city review and inspection" ;
proeth:affectedparties "City",
"Firm A",
"Private developers" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "177" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:10:12.345943+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "177" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:10:12.345943+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "We are particular troubled by the fact that Firm A is expected to perform review and inspection services for one client while being compensated for those services by another client" ;
proeth:stateclass "Compensated-by-Regulated-Party Public Review Conflict State" ;
proeth:subject "Firm A's receipt of compensation from developers for review and inspection services rendered on behalf of the city" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not terminated within the case" ;
proeth:textreferences "We are particular troubled by the fact that Firm A is expected to perform review and inspection services for one client while being compensated for those services by another client",
"reviews those drawings at developer expense for the benefit of the city, and also performs inspection services at developer expense for the benefit of the city" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Firm A accepting compensation from developers for services whose beneficiary is the city" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 177 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:35:05.770747"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 177 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
177
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T09:10:12.345943+00:00
First case
177
Generated
2026-03-01T09:10:12.345943+00:00
Attributed to
Case 177 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T09:35:05.770747
Generated by
ProEthica Case 177 Extraction