County Commission BER 62-7 Client
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#County_Commission_BER_62-7_Client
Definition
County commission lacking its own engineering staff that retained a private consulting engineer to perform all necessary engineering and advisory services, including plan approval — unaware that the same engineer was simultaneously retained by a private developer in contract negotiations with the commission.
Properties
Instance of
Attributes
| engineering_staff | None — relied entirely on retained consultant |
| services_retained | All engineering and advisory services including sewage/water studies, sanitary district financing, plan approval |
Confidence
0.85
Importance
medium
Relationships
| type | client_of |
| target | BER 62-7 County Commission Engineering Consultant |
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
an engineering consultant had been retained by a county commission to perform all necessary engineering and advisory services
Text references
The commission did not have an engineering staff so the engineer acted as the staff for the commission
an engineering consultant had been retained by a county commission to perform all necessary engineering and advisory services
TTL
@prefix case177: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case177:County_Commission_BER_62-7_Client a proeth:CountyEngineeringClient,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "County Commission BER 62-7 Client" ;
proeth:attributes "{'engineering_staff': 'None — relied entirely on retained consultant', 'services_retained': 'All engineering and advisory services including sewage/water studies, sanitary district financing, plan approval'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "County commission lacking its own engineering staff that retained a private consulting engineer to perform all necessary engineering and advisory services, including plan approval — unaware that the same engineer was simultaneously retained by a private developer in contract negotiations with the commission." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "177" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:09:36.973784+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "177" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:09:36.973784+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'client_of', 'target': 'BER 62-7 County Commission Engineering Consultant'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "County Engineering Client" ;
proeth:sourcetext "an engineering consultant had been retained by a county commission to perform all necessary engineering and advisory services" ;
proeth:textreferences "The commission did not have an engineering staff so the engineer acted as the staff for the commission",
"an engineering consultant had been retained by a county commission to perform all necessary engineering and advisory services" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 177 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:35:05.770278"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 177 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
177
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T09:09:36.973784+00:00
First case
177
Generated
2026-03-01T09:09:36.973784+00:00
Attributed to
Case 177 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T09:35:05.770278
Generated by
ProEthica Case 177 Extraction