Owner Misapplication of Loyalty Principle Against Engineer A
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/176#Owner_Misapplication_of_Loyalty_Principle_Against_Engineer_A
Properties
Instance of
Applied to
Engineer A's impartial finding in favor of the General Contractor
Balancing with
Impartiality in Contractually Designated Dispute Resolution Role
Objectivity
Concrete expression
The Owner incorrectly invoked the loyalty principle to argue that Engineer A was ethically obligated to find in the Owner's favor in the concrete pour dispute, misreading loyalty as requiring partisan findings rather than honest, role-faithful performance
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Interpretation
The Owner's invocation of loyalty represents a surface-level misreading: loyalty does not require an engineer to abandon impartiality when the contractual role is explicitly adjudicatory; the Owner's genuine interest is served by an accurate resolution, not a biased one
Invoked by
Owner Construction Dispute Client
Tension resolution
The loyalty claim was rejected: the Owner's acceptance of Engineer A's interpretation implicitly acknowledged that the impartial finding was correct, and the ethical analysis confirms that loyalty in this context required honest performance of the adjudicatory role
Source Evidence
Source text
Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor.
Text references
Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor.
TTL
@prefix case176: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/176#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case176:Owner_Misapplication_of_Loyalty_Principle_Against_Engineer_A a proeth:Loyalty,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Owner Misapplication of Loyalty Principle Against Engineer A" ;
proeth:appliedto "Engineer A's impartial finding in favor of the General Contractor" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Impartiality in Contractually Designated Dispute Resolution Role",
"Objectivity" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "The Owner incorrectly invoked the loyalty principle to argue that Engineer A was ethically obligated to find in the Owner's favor in the concrete pour dispute, misreading loyalty as requiring partisan findings rather than honest, role-faithful performance" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "176" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T11:00:06.073747+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "176" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T11:00:06.073747+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The Owner's invocation of loyalty represents a surface-level misreading: loyalty does not require an engineer to abandon impartiality when the contractual role is explicitly adjudicatory; the Owner's genuine interest is served by an accurate resolution, not a biased one" ;
proeth:invokedby "Owner Construction Dispute Client" ;
proeth:principleclass "Loyalty" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The loyalty claim was rejected: the Owner's acceptance of Engineer A's interpretation implicitly acknowledged that the impartial finding was correct, and the ethical analysis confirms that loyalty in this context required honest performance of the adjudicatory role" ;
proeth:textreferences "Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 176 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T11:13:16.196334"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 176 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
176
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T11:00:06.073747+00:00
First case
176
Generated
2026-03-01T11:00:06.073747+00:00
Attributed to
Case 176 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T11:13:16.196334
Generated by
ProEthica Case 176 Extraction