General Contractor Construction Dispute Party
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/176#General_Contractor_Construction_Dispute_Party
Definition
Party to a dispute with the Owner over the acceptability of a concrete pour; jointly requested Engineer A's impartial review with the Owner; prevailed in Engineer A's ruling based on Owner-approved changes to the work.
Properties
Instance of
ConstructionDisputeGeneralContractor
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConstructionDisputeGeneralContractor
Attributes
| dispute_subject | Acceptability of a concrete pour |
| dispute_outcome | Prevailed in Engineer A's impartial ruling |
| basis_for_ruling | Owner had approved certain changes in the work and Contractor complied with those changes |
Confidence
0.88
Importance
medium
Relationships
| type | dispute_party_against |
| target | Owner |
| type | requested_review_from |
| target | Engineer A |
| type | subject_to_ruling_by |
| target | Engineer A |
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
a dispute arises between the Owner and the General Contractor concerning the acceptability of a concrete pour by the Contractor
Text references
Engineer A agrees with the Contractor's position, noting that the Owner had approved certain changes in the work and that the Contractor complied with those changes
The Owner and the Contractor ask Engineer A to review the dispute
a dispute arises between the Owner and the General Contractor concerning the acceptability of a concrete pour by the Contractor
TTL
@prefix case176: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/176#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case176:General_Contractor_Construction_Dispute_Party a proeth:ConstructionDisputeGeneralContractor,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "General Contractor Construction Dispute Party" ;
proeth:attributes "{'dispute_subject': 'Acceptability of a concrete pour', 'dispute_outcome': \"Prevailed in Engineer A's impartial ruling\", 'basis_for_ruling': 'Owner had approved certain changes in the work and Contractor complied with those changes'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Party to a dispute with the Owner over the acceptability of a concrete pour; jointly requested Engineer A's impartial review with the Owner; prevailed in Engineer A's ruling based on Owner-approved changes to the work." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "176" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:56:40.811396+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "176" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:56:40.811396+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'dispute_party_against', 'target': 'Owner'}",
"{'type': 'requested_review_from', 'target': 'Engineer A'}",
"{'type': 'subject_to_ruling_by', 'target': 'Engineer A'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Construction Dispute General Contractor" ;
proeth:sourcetext "a dispute arises between the Owner and the General Contractor concerning the acceptability of a concrete pour by the Contractor" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A agrees with the Contractor's position, noting that the Owner had approved certain changes in the work and that the Contractor complied with those changes",
"The Owner and the Contractor ask Engineer A to review the dispute",
"a dispute arises between the Owner and the General Contractor concerning the acceptability of a concrete pour by the Contractor" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 176 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T11:13:16.194150"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 176 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
176
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:56:40.811396+00:00
First case
176
Generated
2026-03-01T10:56:40.811396+00:00
Attributed to
Case 176 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T11:13:16.194150
Generated by
ProEthica Case 176 Extraction