BER Case 83-1
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/174#BER_Case_83-1
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.98
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 83-1
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review in deliberating the current case
Used in context
Cited as the primary analogical precedent for evaluating whether Firm Y's continued listing of Engineer X in promotional materials after resignation notice constitutes a misrepresentation of pertinent facts with intent to enhance firm qualifications; the Board distinguishes the present case from BER 83-1 on the basis of 'key employee' designation and intent
Source Evidence
Source text
The Board has, in recent years, had occasion to consider a case similar to the instant case. In Case BER 83-1, Engineer A worked for Engineer B.
Text references
In BER Case 83-1, a second point which we considered was whether it was the 'intent and purpose' of Engineer B to 'enhance the firm's qualifications and work'
In the BER Case 83-1, Engineer A was highlighted in the firm's promotional brochure as a 'key employee.'
The Board has, in recent years, had occasion to consider a case similar to the instant case. In Case BER 83-1, Engineer A worked for Engineer B.
unlike BER Case 83-1 we are reluctant to conclude that the actions of Firm Y and Engineer Z in including the name of Engineer X in the firm's brochure and resume demonstrate an intent to 'enhance the firm's qualifications and work'
TTL
@prefix case174: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/174#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case174:BER_Case_83-1 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER Case 83-1" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.98" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "174" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 83-1" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T12:14:18.392246+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "174" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T12:14:18.392246+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "The Board has, in recent years, had occasion to consider a case similar to the instant case. In Case BER 83-1, Engineer A worked for Engineer B." ;
proeth:textreferences "In BER Case 83-1, a second point which we considered was whether it was the 'intent and purpose' of Engineer B to 'enhance the firm's qualifications and work'",
"In the BER Case 83-1, Engineer A was highlighted in the firm's promotional brochure as a 'key employee.'",
"The Board has, in recent years, had occasion to consider a case similar to the instant case. In Case BER 83-1, Engineer A worked for Engineer B.",
"unlike BER Case 83-1 we are reluctant to conclude that the actions of Firm Y and Engineer Z in including the name of Engineer X in the firm's brochure and resume demonstrate an intent to 'enhance the firm's qualifications and work'" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review in deliberating the current case" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Cited as the primary analogical precedent for evaluating whether Firm Y's continued listing of Engineer X in promotional materials after resignation notice constitutes a misrepresentation of pertinent facts with intent to enhance firm qualifications; the Board distinguishes the present case from BER 83-1 on the basis of 'key employee' designation and intent" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 174 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T12:34:10.117687"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 174 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
174
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T12:14:18.392246+00:00
First case
174
Generated
2026-03-01T12:14:18.392246+00:00
Attributed to
Case 174 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T12:34:10.117687
Generated by
ProEthica Case 174 Extraction