BER-Case-Precedent-Firm-Personnel-Misrepresentation

Individual 468c93a6
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/174#BER-Case-Precedent-Firm-Personnel-Misrepresentation
Properties
Parent
BERCasePrecedent
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BERCasePrecedent
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.8
Createdby
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Documenttitle
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case Precedents on Firm Personnel and Qualification Misrepresentation
Importance
medium
Resourceclass
BER Case Precedent
Usedby
Ethics reviewers and Engineer Z in evaluating obligations
Usedincontext
Analogical precedents from the NSPE Board of Ethical Review addressing situations where firm principals misrepresented personnel qualifications or continued to list departed/departing engineers in firm marketing materials
Version
Various
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer Z, a principal in Firm Y, continues to distribute a brochure identifying Engineer X as an employee of the firm and list Engineer X on the firm resume

Text References
Engineer Z, a principal in Firm Y, continues to distribute a brochure identifying Engineer X as an employee of the firm and list Engineer X on the firm resume
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proethica_case_174: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/174> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/174#BER-Case-Precedent-Firm-Personnel-Misrepresentation> a owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "BER-Case-Precedent-Firm-Personnel-Misrepresentation" ; rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BERCasePrecedent> .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Content Hash
468c93a6a9727271...
Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
174
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T12:13:42.834942+00:00
First Case
174
Generated
2026-03-01T12:13:42.834942+00:00
Attributed To
Case 174 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T12:34:10.117389
Generated By
ProEthica Case 174 Extraction