Vague Responsibility Assumption Insufficiency Applied to Engineer B's Title Sheet Note
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#Vague_Responsibility_Assumption_Insufficiency_Applied_to_Engineer_Bs_Title_Sheet_Note
Properties
Instance of
VagueResponsibilityAssumptionInsufficiencyforSealedPlanModification
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#VagueResponsibilityAssumptionInsufficiencyforSealedPlanModification
Applied to
38-sheet public improvement plan set
Title sheet note
Balancing with
Practical efficiency in large plan sets
Concrete expression
Engineer B's note on the title sheet of the public improvement plans claiming responsibility for 'revisions of the plans' — without identifying any specific revision, without removing Engineer A's seal, and without signing any modified sheet — was wholly insufficient to satisfy the professional accountability obligations arising from major design changes to a 38-sheet plan set.
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Interpretation
A single title-sheet declaration claiming responsibility for unspecified 'revisions' while leaving the original engineer's seal intact on all 38 sheets fails on every dimension of adequate professional accountability: it lacks specificity, lacks proper sealing formality, and does not remove the misleading implication that Engineer A certified the modified design.
Invoked by
Engineer B Undocumented Alteration Successor Design Engineer
Tension resolution
The insufficiency of the vague declaration is not cured by any practical efficiency argument; proper accountability requires both specificity and formal sealing procedures.
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer B placed a note on the title sheet of the public improvement plans, leaving Engineer A's signature and seal intact, stating that he, Engineer B, is taking responsibility for the 'revisions of the plans,' making no notation what those changes were.
Text references
Engineer B placed a note on the title sheet of the public improvement plans, leaving Engineer A's signature and seal intact, stating that he, Engineer B, is taking responsibility for the 'revisions of the plans,' making no notation what those changes were.
TTL
@prefix case173: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case173:Vague_Responsibility_Assumption_Insufficiency_Applied_to_Engineer_Bs_Title_Sheet_Note a proeth:VagueResponsibilityAssumptionInsufficiencyforSealedPlanModification,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Vague Responsibility Assumption Insufficiency Applied to Engineer B's Title Sheet Note" ;
proeth:appliedto "38-sheet public improvement plan set",
"Title sheet note" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Practical efficiency in large plan sets" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer B's note on the title sheet of the public improvement plans claiming responsibility for 'revisions of the plans' — without identifying any specific revision, without removing Engineer A's seal, and without signing any modified sheet — was wholly insufficient to satisfy the professional accountability obligations arising from major design changes to a 38-sheet plan set." ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "173" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T14:20:21.416449+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "173" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T14:20:21.416449+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "A single title-sheet declaration claiming responsibility for unspecified 'revisions' while leaving the original engineer's seal intact on all 38 sheets fails on every dimension of adequate professional accountability: it lacks specificity, lacks proper sealing formality, and does not remove the misleading implication that Engineer A certified the modified design." ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer B Undocumented Alteration Successor Design Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Vague Responsibility Assumption Insufficiency for Sealed Plan Modification" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer B placed a note on the title sheet of the public improvement plans, leaving Engineer A's signature and seal intact, stating that he, Engineer B, is taking responsibility for the 'revisions of the plans,' making no notation what those changes were." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The insufficiency of the vague declaration is not cured by any practical efficiency argument; proper accountability requires both specificity and formal sealing procedures." ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B placed a note on the title sheet of the public improvement plans, leaving Engineer A's signature and seal intact, stating that he, Engineer B, is taking responsibility for the 'revisions of the plans,' making no notation what those changes were." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 173 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:41:54.499843"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 173 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
173
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T14:20:21.416449+00:00
First case
173
Generated
2026-03-01T14:20:21.416449+00:00
Attributed to
Case 173 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:41:54.499843
Generated by
ProEthica Case 173 Extraction